Skip to main content

Tevez frustration is caused by overly powerful bosses

Tevez could leave suddenly like Robinho's exit, not quite a coincidence.
Manchester City used to be a side playing in Maine Road best known for introducing talent such as Shaun Wright-Phillips and Joey Barton (both now at QPR). However, over the last five years - they have become the centre of controversy over the money dealings they produced such as moving stadiums and naming it "Etihad Stadium". They've bought incredible players such as Sergio Aguero, Yaya Toure and Edin Dzeko, but one has possibly turned his back on the club forever.

I'm sure every other Manchester City fan must feel betrayed after the negative publicity given to Carlos Tevez - when he moved from the red side to blue, that "Welcome to Manchester" sign must have ticked off some City supporters now after last night's refusal to feature as a used substitute against Bayern Munich. We could argue about his wages any day of the week but to me, wage mustn't be the issue in this situation. If he chose to play last night, his lack of dedication would have shown and the scoreline would have been probably worse than 2-0 as far as Man. City was concerned.

Generally, on the pitch since his move to Man City in 2009, he was a pure professional. He has scored 52 goals in 84 games in all competitions and was one of the key players to give Manchester City the unbelievable chance of a Champions League appearance. However, he has been distracted with the transfer rumours surrounding him. He spoke in May at an interview with an Argentinian TV channel reward of his hatred towards the city of Manchester and would want a transfer move imminently.

Back in August, Corinthians of Brazil offered City around the region between £35m and £50m for Tevez (different media outlets rumoured various millions went to the table) - an offer which I felt was fair for the Argentine's talent and the mistake Man City made was declining the offer(s). He said in May he would never return to Manchester so why on earth did Man. City refuse an exceptional amount of money which would have benefited both clubs and the player? It was foolish on City's account. Yes, they can hold their heads high and say they've kept a superb footballer and act heroically sending a message that Tevez is more highly valuable, but if they accepted the offer, Tevez would have been much happier and to be honest, Man. City would have won every match this season. Drawing 2-2 at Fulham, where Tevez played the last ten minutes, and losing to Bayern Munich last night were games where they could have done much better. To top his frustration and lack of playing time this season, Tevez was stripped off his captaincy and given the all important role to Belgian defender Vincent Kompany three weeks ago. It's certainly not helping Tevez and isn't giving him any reason to stay.

I don't believe Carlos Tevez has family problems in Argentina - if he did, his club would have allowed him to leave on some sort of compassionate grounds. The management team at Man. City are toying with every player and like Roman Abramovich, gets "bored" and simply get rid of big named faces who have been great ambassadors to the clubs. Like Carlo Ancelotti at Chelsea and even, it could be argued Rupert Murdoch treats his many employees at News Corporation with disrespect and fires them instantly, seeking for excuses. Every person has a certain amount of power but some take it to a radical extent. The Abu Dhabi owners have driven the likes of Tevez and Robinho (pictured) up the wall and I don't think Roberto Mancini realise this, hence his rant at the post-match conference last night. There's more to "refusing to play" than just refusing to play. There is a lot of talk behind scenes which is not emphasised on the news - I'm sure revelations will start coming out soon. Eventually.

Like this, like "The world as I see it blog" on Facebook. Or alternatively, follow me on Twitter @johnsalehprice

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced