Skip to main content

Disciplining children needs to start at home

 Bringing back the cane could make matters worse in schools

On Friday, after watching one "later kick-off" of the thrilling Rugby World Cup 2011 between New Zealand and Japan, I kept ITV on and viewed This Morning. It has been a while since I last saw the show and it did offer an interesting debate. Eamonn Holmes and his wife, Ruth Langsford were discussing the morning papers' eye-grabbing headlines of the day with TV presenter Tim Lovejoy and actress Linda Robson. The story they were talking about was a claim by The Daily Mail that half of parents would like schools to "bring back the cane" and use them when children misbehave - and that teachers would love them to return too.

Corporal punishment officially ended in state schools in 1987, 24 years ago and David Cameron has welcomed the fact schools need to discipline their students in order to avoid a repeat of the English riots which may have scarred him for the rest of his time as Prime Minister. The level of youth employment continues to be a pain and the PM warns parents their benefits will be slashed if their children are convicted of truancy.

Cameron has dedicated a lot of his hours on "improving schools" and some places have taken disciplinary action to an entirely new level. Every teacher at Phoenix Free Secondary School in Manchester had been, or still are part of the armed forces while new head teacher, Dr. Rory Fox of Basildon Academy, Essex spent his first day in charge by sending 150 pupils home due to breaking minor rules such as wearing incorrect trousers or simply forgetting their ruler at home. They may sound harsh but they are headlines which surely pleases the Prime Minister and perhaps concerned parents who wish corporal punishment wouldn't return.

Let me bring you back to the point of corporal punishment. I recall the lines of a famous 1979 hit by Pink Floyd "Another Brick in the Wall". The song, which came number one in ten different countries, sent a clear message to teachers and the campaign for "leaving the kids alone" lasted a long time but in the bitter end. The children succeeded and from 1987 onwards, education was seen at a different light.

GCSE and A-Level results were revamped and attracting record amount of students to take those "all important" exams and pass rates every year have been on the up. Without the use of canes etc, more children are encouraged to attend school often and have the extra desire to succeed without worrying over the prospect of being hit. Times have changed since all those years ago and I feel re-introducing the cane will be a new low to a failing education system.

I feel that teachers are given far too much responsibility and pressure to control 25-30 children in crammed classrooms which is unfair on them. When I was in school, some teachers focused in lessons on telling the small amount of children off for being disruptive than teaching the subjects they are hired to teach. They are doing the parents' job to discipline the children. Teachers realise that different children have a variety of needs as it's their mothers and fathers roles to raise them in a less ego-centric environment. This has to start at an early stage and I realise it's difficult to raise your child with very little finances but they had to consider that before they want to start up a family.

Caning and hitting children simply discourages them and it's the wrong sort of discipline. As it stands, children of 1987 and before were mostly convicted of the summer English disturbances (1,351 suspects) compared to the smaller amount of juveniles up to the age of 17 (364 suspects) and bringing back corporal punishment could lead to more disruption in the streets. The government must talk of these parents out of thinking caning is a bright idea as I doubt they'd like to see their children come home with scars all over their arms. Parents need to raise their children thinking positive over seriously rather than vice-verse. Raising children is meant to be fun.

Like this, like "The world as I see it blog" on Facebook. Or alternatively, follow me on Twitter @johnsalehprice

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...