Skip to main content

9/11 Ten Years On: America have to take big leaps towards recovery

 Barack Obama has tough task to get US back on its feet.

Newspapers across the world have been building up towards the ten year anniversary since the globe was in total stand-still. The scenes at 9/11 still shock me and it is one of those events where you knew where you were and what you were doing at that moment. For me, I was a ten-year-old boy who had very little knowledge of politics and news. I, among other primary school pupils, were told to go home early and I recall watching both BBC and ITV News truly gobsmacked by what happened. The day after, back at school - my teacher told the class to draw-up a memory of 9/11 such as the twin towers falling or anything which would remind them of it.

Regarding 9/11, Channel 4 have this week covered the event thoroughly going through the men behind the bombings of the twin towers, producing new and exclusive footage of the disaster etc. However the actual event isn't the sole purpose of this blog post. I want to focus on what happened afterwards as the world has turned drastic corners which have affected everyone of us, particularly in the United States.

During the time of 9/11, George W. Bush was the President and despite his minimal reaction at a school when the planes struck the World Trade Centre, New York City and further attacks at The Pentagon, Arlington near Washington, people still trusted his words that the culprits will be punished. He did so by sending his troops to Afghanistan a month after the terror attacks attempting to defeat the Taliban forces. Today, this war is costing the American economy almost half a trillion dollars (dated 9th September 2011), decision which was initially praised by Bush supporters and global leaders who followed US' lead.

However, since the Twin Towers fell and the Afghan War started, multiculturalism sharply declined and more social neglect went towards the Middle Easterns and other ethnic minorities compared to before these events. This continued when Bush's America-led coalition forces controversially invaded Iraq to bring Saddam Hussein down. That's cost US over three-quarters-of-a-trillion dollars, consequently leading to markets crashing on September 2008, the worst recession in an awfully long time. Seeing Lehman Brothers employees walking out of their offices with boxes full of their belongings wasn't a pretty sight.

This was all under Bush's name. People began to have had enough. They felt it was time for a change. New tactics and more awareness politically and financially was needed to bring US forward and move on from the fear of another 9/11.

In November 2008, United States chose a Democrat President - their first black leader in Barack Obama. He was the man who the majority of Americans thought could do the world of good for the US. So much pressure was put on him and yet people still not pleased. The economy is still crippled despite having troops out of Iraq and are on the process of leaving Afghanistan, the health system (not mentioned before) has been hugely criticised over the years and unemployment is at an all time high. People aren't impressed and it's Obama's job to turn things around.

It is a difficult job to thrill over 300 million US citizens however only 43% approve of Barack Obama, much lower than how both George Bush's and Bill Clinton were rated during their third year of Presidency. Pressure is certainly on him but it's not all doom-and-gloom. Democrats could feel a little more comfortable over the Republican's unknown future. Still four candidates are itching to grab one of the biggest role in modern American politics and become the opposition leader but it's unclear who will take this job. It's all too close and there is no clear indication yet, according to those all important polls of who will compete against Obama.

There is political upheaval across the world, no doubt - especially from what we've seen in the Middle East and northern Africa, and in America believe-it-or-not is similar but obviously not as extreme. Time is running out for Obama as that 43% statistic could fall to below the 40 mark, not for the first time and if he wants to be President for a further four years, he has to unite his country. The job is hard but it's do-able. No doubt, his "honeymoon period" has been long gone but he needs to get America's self belief like in 2008 when Obama won the election.

One way of doing that is in a sense, moving on from 9/11. Don't think of it as a sinister comment. Eye-witnesses and families of 2,996 who died at the World Trade Centre and The Pentagon have been scarred for life. However, we seem to link any sort of extremism action to 9/11 such as the 7/7 bombings in London and the July 22 massacre in Norway and it creates more hatred towards one another. We fear terrorism and the Taliban and other group take advantage of this, they know politicians are not really prepared apart from the further securities at airports but I want more organisation by world leaders.

The world can't go back to normal after the attacks ten years ago but we must accept we cannot change the past.

I heard Obama's speech yesterday, desparately trying to increase his ratings and attempting to take some positive actions regarding the frail job market, however, he needs to ensure his people have trust in him. Under his name, they've killed Osama Bin Laden which helped but there is still a "threat" of terrorism and Obama has to lead all the other countries ensuring them that they're doing everything to make the world safer. He only has until November 2012 and if he loses the election, it's up to the next person to try and contribute. Time and patience is running out though. US are still the powerhouse of the world and we look up to them - now they have to show their gratification.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced