Skip to main content

Politics and Religion interfere too much with sport

Two stories have alarmed me this week, both including different sports which have been crippled by the power of politics and religion.

F1 chiefs agree to cancel Bahrain GP
The Bahrain Grand Prix was about to be the opening race of the 2011 season, but was postponed weeks before the race, due to the unrest at the Arab country as the public there no longer feel Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa should be king. His reign began 12 years ago but with the riots appearing deadly and out-of-hand, the Formula 1 management team, including Bernie Ecclestone their CEO have cancelled the event for this year.

FIA was convinced that, according to a report, Bahrain's situation has "stabalised" and the race should go ahead whilst the racing car teams condemned this decision. At the same time, perhaps coincidently, Damon Hill will leave his post as President of British Racing Drivers' Club from August. The online campaign group Avaaz, along with 450,000 people worldwide successfully pleaded the Formula 1 committee not to stage this Grand Prix this year.

It can be said that Formula 1 at the moment, is in a mess. With the "crashgate" allegations in Singapore 2008, and other controversies, the sport hasn't quite recovered. However, they still provide spectators with races, offering exceptional driving and everyone is asking themselves who could possibly beat Sebastian Vettel? But too much focus this season has been on the Bahrain Grand Prix.

The country itself is not safe, we can all agree on that but judging the fact that the race wouldn't have been until another four-and-a-half months, the decision whether the GP should go ahead was too early. They were right to postpone it in the first place, for the safety of the drivers and supporters but cancelling it altogether this week could possibly create more uproar in Bahrain.

Sport brings people together. Formula 1 is definitely a sport which has risen in popularity over the past few decades. Although, some believe the decision to host the event would have been a "kick in the teeth to the people of Bahrain", I feel that Formula 1 committee should have talked to the public first to see if they were up for it. If the race went ahead, it could take the attention off their intentions to riot in the capital city, Manama.

Yes, hundreds of thousands around the world have condemned the fact that the race is going ahead but I wished the decision was delayed until the situation reached its peak of unrest, if it hasn't already. The Middle Easterns have had their say with other leader's future starting with Tunisia, Egypt at the start of the year followed by Yemen. Could Bahrain have their say, finally? I certainly hope so for the public's sake. It's never good to wake up in the morning knowing someone innocent has lost their life due to politics.

Iranian Women football team left in tears after Olympic expulsion
This is the news that Iran's women national football team were forced to be expelled from the London 2012 Olympic games due to the side wearing head-scarves during a qualifying match against Vietnam. The match had not even started before they were told they were not to play because of their garments. Therefore the match ended 3-0 to Bahrain without a ball being kicked and the Iranian players's went emotional.

It was truly a sorry sight. These women had a fantastic opportunity to shine at possibly the biggest stage taken away from them just because they were following Islamic rules.

Did they break Fifa rules? By the looks of it there is no sign of a rule to ban head-scarves. On page 18 of their "laws of the game" section, updated for the 2010/11 season says:

"A player must not use equipment or wear anything that is dangerous to himself [or herself] or another player (including any kind of jewellery)."
As far as I am aware, head-scarves are not dangerous garments and no other rule on that 150-odd page book suggests anything to do with them being exempt. I also looked at football London 2012 Olympics rulebook regarding the competition and again, no rule regarding wearing such garments. There was no mention either on the religious aspect of the game.

I completely understand Iran football team's predigament. It is an absolute disgrace when a team is treated like that by a governing body who are already under increasing scrutiny. The garments were not going to harm anyone, and the side didn't broken the law.

The Iranian government have to take some blame for his though. They insist upon women wearing head garments as it's part of the Islamic religion. I've not looked too much into it but a female wearing a head-scarf seems to be compulsary so it can be argued that the footballer's were forced to wear it - this shows lack of freedom and lack of choice and I think this incident which occured on a Sunday should send a message to the Ahmadinejad and his government.

Iran Football Federation have since written a letter of complain to Fifa but the chance of being reinstated is slight. It's a huge shame and the world governing body have to explain themselves.

These two news stories question the role of politics and religion in sport. To me, and to others football, or Formula 1 is considered as a religion in their own right. Sport is getting far too commercialised and it's a pity that these sports have been heavily influenced by two subjects which in my opinion, are interfering too much with sport. The unfortunate thing is that they are going to influence sport even more in the future, making sport, less like sport and more focus will go on the build up of matches or races rather than the actual event itself which takes the fun out of sport.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...