Skip to main content

Politics and Religion interfere too much with sport

Two stories have alarmed me this week, both including different sports which have been crippled by the power of politics and religion.

F1 chiefs agree to cancel Bahrain GP
The Bahrain Grand Prix was about to be the opening race of the 2011 season, but was postponed weeks before the race, due to the unrest at the Arab country as the public there no longer feel Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa should be king. His reign began 12 years ago but with the riots appearing deadly and out-of-hand, the Formula 1 management team, including Bernie Ecclestone their CEO have cancelled the event for this year.

FIA was convinced that, according to a report, Bahrain's situation has "stabalised" and the race should go ahead whilst the racing car teams condemned this decision. At the same time, perhaps coincidently, Damon Hill will leave his post as President of British Racing Drivers' Club from August. The online campaign group Avaaz, along with 450,000 people worldwide successfully pleaded the Formula 1 committee not to stage this Grand Prix this year.

It can be said that Formula 1 at the moment, is in a mess. With the "crashgate" allegations in Singapore 2008, and other controversies, the sport hasn't quite recovered. However, they still provide spectators with races, offering exceptional driving and everyone is asking themselves who could possibly beat Sebastian Vettel? But too much focus this season has been on the Bahrain Grand Prix.

The country itself is not safe, we can all agree on that but judging the fact that the race wouldn't have been until another four-and-a-half months, the decision whether the GP should go ahead was too early. They were right to postpone it in the first place, for the safety of the drivers and supporters but cancelling it altogether this week could possibly create more uproar in Bahrain.

Sport brings people together. Formula 1 is definitely a sport which has risen in popularity over the past few decades. Although, some believe the decision to host the event would have been a "kick in the teeth to the people of Bahrain", I feel that Formula 1 committee should have talked to the public first to see if they were up for it. If the race went ahead, it could take the attention off their intentions to riot in the capital city, Manama.

Yes, hundreds of thousands around the world have condemned the fact that the race is going ahead but I wished the decision was delayed until the situation reached its peak of unrest, if it hasn't already. The Middle Easterns have had their say with other leader's future starting with Tunisia, Egypt at the start of the year followed by Yemen. Could Bahrain have their say, finally? I certainly hope so for the public's sake. It's never good to wake up in the morning knowing someone innocent has lost their life due to politics.

Iranian Women football team left in tears after Olympic expulsion
This is the news that Iran's women national football team were forced to be expelled from the London 2012 Olympic games due to the side wearing head-scarves during a qualifying match against Vietnam. The match had not even started before they were told they were not to play because of their garments. Therefore the match ended 3-0 to Bahrain without a ball being kicked and the Iranian players's went emotional.

It was truly a sorry sight. These women had a fantastic opportunity to shine at possibly the biggest stage taken away from them just because they were following Islamic rules.

Did they break Fifa rules? By the looks of it there is no sign of a rule to ban head-scarves. On page 18 of their "laws of the game" section, updated for the 2010/11 season says:

"A player must not use equipment or wear anything that is dangerous to himself [or herself] or another player (including any kind of jewellery)."
As far as I am aware, head-scarves are not dangerous garments and no other rule on that 150-odd page book suggests anything to do with them being exempt. I also looked at football London 2012 Olympics rulebook regarding the competition and again, no rule regarding wearing such garments. There was no mention either on the religious aspect of the game.

I completely understand Iran football team's predigament. It is an absolute disgrace when a team is treated like that by a governing body who are already under increasing scrutiny. The garments were not going to harm anyone, and the side didn't broken the law.

The Iranian government have to take some blame for his though. They insist upon women wearing head garments as it's part of the Islamic religion. I've not looked too much into it but a female wearing a head-scarf seems to be compulsary so it can be argued that the footballer's were forced to wear it - this shows lack of freedom and lack of choice and I think this incident which occured on a Sunday should send a message to the Ahmadinejad and his government.

Iran Football Federation have since written a letter of complain to Fifa but the chance of being reinstated is slight. It's a huge shame and the world governing body have to explain themselves.

These two news stories question the role of politics and religion in sport. To me, and to others football, or Formula 1 is considered as a religion in their own right. Sport is getting far too commercialised and it's a pity that these sports have been heavily influenced by two subjects which in my opinion, are interfering too much with sport. The unfortunate thing is that they are going to influence sport even more in the future, making sport, less like sport and more focus will go on the build up of matches or races rather than the actual event itself which takes the fun out of sport.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced