Skip to main content

Is the World REALLY a better place?

It has been a remarkable last couple of weeks. Prince William and Kate Middleton, now known as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge finally wed in front of 24.5 million spectators in the UK alone. Also, Britain said "no" to the Alternative Vote system in convincing style whilst Manchester United are set to be record breakers as they are on the verge of their 19th top-flight title after beating Chelsea last Sunday.

But I'm not posting a blog about any of those headlines. One headline, in my view that has dominated the press is the death of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. After ten years of hiding, he was finally found in a remote destination in north of Pakistan. US forces took their opportunity to shoot/torture him until his heart stopped beating and when pronounced dead, the military put his body in the sea. It will take a while until someone would want to retrieve his body under the sea...

To me, the whole thing was a complete surprise. For one moment, because of the lack of news coverage, I thought the US government had given up this mission, despite still being involved in Afghanistan trying to defeat al-Qaeda. Now they've killed their boss, what next?

What next? It's a very vague question, one has to admit. It's like growing a new tree. You start planting the tree, give it some natural sunlight and clean water waiting for it to grow, developing branches coming from all different directions. That is the situation we are in, but some of these branches will link together. Some in perfect harmony, some with caution.

A lot of people were effected by the 9/11 attacks, almost ten years ago which was mastermind by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and bin Laden's al-Qaeda organisation. The world came together, condoling those who lost their lives in the World Trade Centre, New York City. So the death of bin Laden on May 2nd, 2011 was good news as far as the people were concerned. As soon as Barack Obama announced this news, the world celebrated. I have never seen people so happy before. A death of a mass-murderer has given people hope and now they feel a little more secure and less paranoid, all over the death of bin Laden.

One problem with this is, just because he passed away, does not mean the organisation he lead has died. Although he was their leader, there will always be someone to replace him and probably do equally as bad things so we do have to remain cautious. US's job to defeat al-Qaeda is far from completed, but killing the leader is a start.

This leads me to the political side to the murder. The timing could not have been better for Barack Obama. We are around the time where his opposition, the Republicans pick their man/woman to go face-to-face with Obama in the 2012's general election. He has had it tough during his time as President as Americans lost faith in him rapidly after his general election win in 2008, especially on national health. It showed during the mid-term elections and he had to prove to his people he was actually born in America as people had doubts due to the fact his middle name was "Hussein". He announced the death with pride and now everyone loves him. Under his Presidency, bin Laden was found, then killed. Not George Bush who initially took his US forces to Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place.

Of course Obama gets little credit though. It only took American forces ten years to find him, seven of which he was not President and without his judgements and co-ordination with his troops in Pakistan, bin Laden would not have been found today. I praise his administration.

The death, on the other hand is a little fishy. A lot of people who I have been talking to have either said; he is not dead as there is lack of evidence to prove it or he died years ago.

These two points are very valid. Is he dead? Al-Qaeda admitted that he died, according to their official statement so it has to be true, surely? We can agree with them and say, yes he is dead - nothing we can do about it but shall we listen to what they are saying? We never listened to them before about anything like this. I hope that this organisation will not be stronger after bin Laden's death, or for this debate's sake, "supposed death".

People argued he was alive because there is no photographic evidence of his death. The White House declined to show any images of him dead. I'm glad they won't show photos of him dead. I mean, who would want to see a picture of a dead man? It would give us a piece of mind, don't get me wrong but to be honest, I don't want to see the sight of Osama bin Laden again.

Another way to find out his death as a certainty is interviewing his wives. I don't know how many wives he had but rumours are spreading that he had a few. News sources such as CNN have identified three of them. None yet have been interviewed but if they will be interviewed, it would be interesting to see what they would say about the situation.

I'm going to conclude by presuming he is dead. To be honest, for the people who say that he died "years ago", they're probably right. No one actually heard from him for quite a long time. No interruptions of Al-Jazeera news bulletins, nothing like that. The news of his death was unexpected. Although we still have to remain cautious, we now have a piece of mind that they are one less al-Qaeda member down. One thing is for certain, we could live our own lives like what we always had been living.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced