Skip to main content

The many faces of Wayne Rooney

Wayne Rooney is one of the most prolific strikers in Europe. He has been part of a Manchester United team who have equalled Liverpool's top flight record of winning the most titles and looks set to overtake their north England rivals if they win the league in six weeks time.

He has been known to have scored the best goals in the 21st Century. The goal he scored against Newcastle in 2006 was truly mind-blowing and most recently, that overhead kick in the Manchester Derby is favourite to become this year's goal of the season. Truly remarkable goals and he is fan's favourite. People look up to him and perhaps could see him as England's next captain before long. At such a young age, he is a sensational football player.

We do on the other hand, see a controversial side to him. He seems to be a very easy target because he was a world class player at an incredibly young age. Basing on what I see in series of documentaries about him, he was born and raised in Liverpool - supposedly in a working class environment and the introduction to his celebrity life took into effect too early.

He went out with Coleen McCoughlin in 2002 when he was only 17 and already attracted presses attention. During the time, he went off with prostitutes which gossip magazines thrived on. He since apologised, but his reputation from then on was one which critics took a close eye on.
Rooney married Coleen in 2009 and have a son together. He takes pride in his family life.

Rooney has also been involved in libel cases, charity work and gets sponsorship deals coming out of his ears. He also appears on the front cover of the UK Fifa PlayStation and X-Box games. He is an icon to young people across Britain.

However, last weekend Rooney has sparked controversy and widespread debate. Man. United travelled to West Ham knowing that a win could improve their chances of Premier League glory. During the first half, the Hammers made United's lives difficult leading 2-0 at half time.

No problem for Man. United, they scored four goals in the second half winning the match 4-2. Wayne Rooney scored the first three, meaning a hat-trick.

The first two goals, very nice. The third goal was through a penalty. Not the most remarkable way to mark a hat-trick but joys echoed at the away end of Upton Park. Rooney went to celebrate with them, not going to embrace with them otherwise he would have received a booking.

But, he went straight to the camera which was showing live footage of the match across the world and swore - twice. He said "F**k come on" and "What? F**king hell!" The audience could hear it clearly. People at different ages, from children to the elderly, at around 2pm on a Saturday afternoon heard every word.

It was announced yesterday that Rooney will be out of action for two games after his actions. He didn't take any excuses, in fact he apologised in an official statement straight after the match, after he was found out but FA had to have their say on the matter.

Big debate here. Huge. Was the FA right to ban him? Was two matches harsh, or not? Has Rooney's suspension sent a message out to clamp down on swearing in football matches?

The ban will last two domestic matches meaning Rooney will miss Man. United's clashes against Fulham this Saturday and either the FA Cup Semi Final match versus Man. City at Wembley on Saturday 16th April or away to Newcastle on the 19th. Not entirely sure myself.

These matches are really significant to his side's chances of winning silverware so his swearing in front of the camera was careless. This whole debacle reminds me of when Didier Drogba of Chelsea was banned for four Champions League matches for his rant at the referee against Barcelona in May 2009. The ban was reduced to three games after the Blues' appeal but his ban was fair. He deserved to be punished and the swearing was uncalled for.

Rooney was only banned for two remember, not targeting a referee like in Drogba's case but to millions of people watching on-screen in pubs, at homes. Why did he do it? No one knows, perhaps passion got ahead of him. Maybe he was talking about the critics who suggests that he's not contributed enough to Man. United's potentially winning season. No one will know, not even too sure if he knows himself.

Two matches for me is not enough, basing on the circumstances. He used foul language at the time when he scored a hat-trick. Drogba made his rant to the referee as soon as his side lost controversially in a Champions League semi-final second leg. There is no comparison which is the most frustrating.

But why do footballers need to swear? There are so many other ways to express emotions without using taboo language. It is a crazy world we're living in. Both Drogba and Rooney get £100,000+ every week and say unnecessary comments like that on live international television - not really leading by example to our youth.

I must admit, there are football supporters who turn up to matches, do not help things as they chant using the "F" or "S" word throughout the 90 minutes. For something considered as the "beautiful game", the culture of football is something which needs to be worked upon. Is swearing banter? Far from it. The "Respect Campaign" needs to start taking to effect as the matter could get worse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced