Skip to main content

Mubarak is only thinking of himself, which will not benefit the poor in troubled Egypt

After all the protests by the Egyptians over the past three weeks, President Mohammad Hosni Mubarak has announced in front of millions across the world of his intentions to remain as leader of Egypt until the general elections later this year. Much to the disgust of the protesters who wanted him out of the job tonight.

These protesters wanted similar success to the Tunisians when they managed to force President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali to resign, meaning a reshuffle to their government. Ben Ali was in charge of Tunisia for 23 years, whilst Egypt's Mubarak enters his 30th year of being in charge of the country - meaning a seven year difference in leadership between the pair.

A lot has happened since Mubarak was sworn into Presidency in 1981. He got Egypt back into the Arab League in 1989 meaning they could regain their voice concerning the modern society in the Middle East. He publically spoke out against the Iraq war in 2003 and has seen changes to his cabinet many times before, including the changing of the economy scene in July 2004. Then the markets in Egypt boomed, particularly in tourism.

Despite this, according to the BBC, Mubarak has survived "six assasination attempts" and Egypt are placed 101st by Human Development Index which was estimated in 2010. It can be argued that 101st is a low ranking compared to Gabon at 93rd and Libya in 53rd. Improvement is needed as far as education, standards of living and life expectancy is concerned. Also, Egypt is low in the rankings as far as giving freedom to the press (133rd) and placed 98th in the Corruption Perception Index scoring just 3.1 out of 10.

Could these be the reasons why the Egyptians are so unhappy? They have planned the 25th January protests for a while so Mubarak was prepared for what was to come. Thousands had joined a Facebook petition for these protests to happen, so they did and haven't stopped since.

It is said that the reason for these protests was to show their disgust by the way they've been treated. They stand against corruption, poverty and unemployment.

Let us look at the statistics to see how bad the Egyptian public are in regarding poverty and unemployment. Across the world, there are one billion people who were living in "absolute poverty". In 1990, the Middle East had 73 million people below the poverty line whilst ten million suffered malnutrition. During the 90s, economy growth was slow meaning standard of living was low.

By 1996, Egypt had 13.7 million people below the poverty line which is equivelant to 22.9% of their population. Despite this large percentage, 52% were considered to be "non-poor". Most of them have low literacy and education levels.

Children as young as eight work up to twelve hours everyday and receive little in return. Women work without pay in their households. The low standard of living shows by the average life expectancy. For females, they get average of 67.2 years to live with the male population average considerably lower. Another reason for this is due to clean running water. Only 40-60% of the poorer population get this, indicating extreme poverty. The national average wage is $1,550, meaning just $4.20 a day.

Unemployment statistics are also shocking. The percentage keeps on rising from 1996 which stood at 11.3%, majority of which are women.

Before I decided to write this blog, I thought "What was their problem?", "Why are the Egyptians protesting to this extent?". With additional research, I can understand their frustration. Judging by the statistics, Egypt are in dire-straits and it's all down to Mubarak's decision making.

It makes me wonder though, have the Egyptians decided to protest now? Mubarak has turned this country upside-down for three decades and that's all he had out of it was being a target for assasination six times?

The Egyptians have voted him in so many times and now they say it's time to go. In my opinion, he should have gone before the statistics were published in Copenhagen and infact Cairo (above). For a country which has a high tourism rate, he should consider his people as his top priority and not the tourists.

Tonight, he has refused to step down and the Egyptians will only be able to breathe this September when he transfers his powers to someone else and the public will have another voice. We can all hope and pray that Mubarak's replacement can perform for the people and not to his/her benefit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced