Skip to main content

Where big debatable topics collide

It's not the case of club or country. It's now the case of club or religion
This year, Ramadan lies in the middle of August. This event in the Islam calendar leads to the run up to Eid, celebrated by almost a billion across the world where followers "fast", meaning not eating, during the day to remember those who are suffering around the developing world. In the Middle East, where this occasion is celebrated most is at its hottest. On average in places such as Dubai and Pakistan see temperatures soar up to between 44-47 degrees Celsius during the summer days.
Where am I getting at? Last weekend, it was announced that Iran football star, Ali Karimi has been sacked by his team, Esteel Azin for failing to fast. It's a very strict policy which every player in Iran, or even the whole of the Middle East has to abide by.
The news came to a shock to a lot of people. One of the best players in Asia, better known as "Asia's Maradona" has been kicked out of the team due to religious purposes. One way in looking at it, Iran is an "Islamic Republic" and he has to respect this. However, if he was at another country playing football, say in Europe, this debacle would never had happened.
Last year, for example, Jose Mourinho, when he was in charge of Inter Milan was heavily criticised by Ghana's football federation for substituting Sulley Muntari off after 30 minutes in a game. During the high temperatures in Italy and having not to have food or water during the day for anyone is a challenge, let alone playing football for a major footballing side who eventually won the Champions League that season. This is what Muntari had to face and being substituted may have been a wise decision made by "The Special One".
Of course I'm not criticising the way people must fast because with me being half Iranian, I respect everything my home nation does. But to do something like this is unreasonable and mean and I certainly hope that Ali Karimi's next career move will be a good one. It seems unlikely though, that it would be in Iran.

Immigration rules getting slightly out of hand
From tomorrow, it will mark 100 days since Nick Clegg had agreed with David Cameron to join a coalition government. Not supported by many, Clegg and Cameron have formed a partnership which leads to even more political debate. One of which being immigration.
During the Prime Ministerial debates prior to the election, immigration was one topic which the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats disagreed on. The Tories wanted a "immigration cap" whilst Clegg wanted "to section the immigrants where they're needed most".
Cameron seemed to have gotten his way so far as this immigration cap will be introduced soon (yet no numbers have been announced). However, one football headline comes to mind which makes me puzzled about the whole thing.
Andranik Teymourian, another Iranian international mentioned in this blog has been denied a chance to join Blackburn Rovers because he missed out on one international match in the last two years - against Saudi Arabia in a World Cup Qualifier. When he first went to the Premiership and joined Bolton Wanderers in 2006, he didn't play "the required 75% of international matches". It wasn't until an appeal which allowed Teymourian to join them.
It was easy for a non-EU citizen to come and live in the UK. We have doctors and nurses who are part of this category and are saving lives and are dedicated to live in the UK. We're living in a country full of opportunities. It's a shame that we don't take them. That's why the immigrants are coming here. So this cap is only going to reduce the amount of doctors for the NHS and even football players who make the Premier League the best competition in the world.
Andranik now has to wait for contacts in Iran and UAE so he can join a club there until January so he could meet the Home Office requirements and become a Blackburn player - if their proposed takeover lets him!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced