Skip to main content

Where big debatable topics collide

It's not the case of club or country. It's now the case of club or religion
This year, Ramadan lies in the middle of August. This event in the Islam calendar leads to the run up to Eid, celebrated by almost a billion across the world where followers "fast", meaning not eating, during the day to remember those who are suffering around the developing world. In the Middle East, where this occasion is celebrated most is at its hottest. On average in places such as Dubai and Pakistan see temperatures soar up to between 44-47 degrees Celsius during the summer days.
Where am I getting at? Last weekend, it was announced that Iran football star, Ali Karimi has been sacked by his team, Esteel Azin for failing to fast. It's a very strict policy which every player in Iran, or even the whole of the Middle East has to abide by.
The news came to a shock to a lot of people. One of the best players in Asia, better known as "Asia's Maradona" has been kicked out of the team due to religious purposes. One way in looking at it, Iran is an "Islamic Republic" and he has to respect this. However, if he was at another country playing football, say in Europe, this debacle would never had happened.
Last year, for example, Jose Mourinho, when he was in charge of Inter Milan was heavily criticised by Ghana's football federation for substituting Sulley Muntari off after 30 minutes in a game. During the high temperatures in Italy and having not to have food or water during the day for anyone is a challenge, let alone playing football for a major footballing side who eventually won the Champions League that season. This is what Muntari had to face and being substituted may have been a wise decision made by "The Special One".
Of course I'm not criticising the way people must fast because with me being half Iranian, I respect everything my home nation does. But to do something like this is unreasonable and mean and I certainly hope that Ali Karimi's next career move will be a good one. It seems unlikely though, that it would be in Iran.

Immigration rules getting slightly out of hand
From tomorrow, it will mark 100 days since Nick Clegg had agreed with David Cameron to join a coalition government. Not supported by many, Clegg and Cameron have formed a partnership which leads to even more political debate. One of which being immigration.
During the Prime Ministerial debates prior to the election, immigration was one topic which the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats disagreed on. The Tories wanted a "immigration cap" whilst Clegg wanted "to section the immigrants where they're needed most".
Cameron seemed to have gotten his way so far as this immigration cap will be introduced soon (yet no numbers have been announced). However, one football headline comes to mind which makes me puzzled about the whole thing.
Andranik Teymourian, another Iranian international mentioned in this blog has been denied a chance to join Blackburn Rovers because he missed out on one international match in the last two years - against Saudi Arabia in a World Cup Qualifier. When he first went to the Premiership and joined Bolton Wanderers in 2006, he didn't play "the required 75% of international matches". It wasn't until an appeal which allowed Teymourian to join them.
It was easy for a non-EU citizen to come and live in the UK. We have doctors and nurses who are part of this category and are saving lives and are dedicated to live in the UK. We're living in a country full of opportunities. It's a shame that we don't take them. That's why the immigrants are coming here. So this cap is only going to reduce the amount of doctors for the NHS and even football players who make the Premier League the best competition in the world.
Andranik now has to wait for contacts in Iran and UAE so he can join a club there until January so he could meet the Home Office requirements and become a Blackburn player - if their proposed takeover lets him!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

Starmer: address the divisions to have an enjoyable winter

Time for bold action, Prime Minister (Image: The Week) Sir Keir Starmer has been Prime Minister for two months and already The Daily Telegraph sound as though he's governed a dystopian Britain for a decade. I suppose the government do need an opposition of some kind, as the Conservatives seek a new leader. Who better to fill those shoes than the paper dubbed the 'Torygraph', led by editor Chris Evans, associate editor Camilla Tominey and their disciples.  Some of the column pieces that have come out of the media title have been bold to say the least. On 7th September 2024 alone, writers have accused Labour of being ' the stupid party ', not understanding ' the most basic rules of economics ', and that Starmer is ' the prisoner of Labour's Leftist factions ' and ' plotting a tax raid on inheritance '. These are quite telling words aimed at a government which, of the nine weeks it's been around, six of them have been summer recess. Duri...