Skip to main content

Scotland can only thrive if Westminster treats SNP like adults

Left to right: John Swinney, Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf (Image: BBC News)

Scottish politics has seen considerable turbulence in recent weeks. This has delighted commentators and politicians who oppose the idea of devolution or the Scottish National Party (SNP) more generally. I mean, after all, the UK general election is just weeks away, any excuse to try and deter the progress of Scotland's largest party. And any excuse to highlight the nation's problems and say that it shouldn't have more independent powers.

Personally, I am more pro-devolution than against. I see its merits but I equally appreciate the need for the concept to reform. The problem has been for years, devolved nations and cities are largely led by parties who aren't the ruling party in Westminster so, naturally, relationships between the Conservatives and leaders in Wales, Manchester, Liverpool, London, and elsewhere, including now Birmingham (which has recently welcomed a Labour Mayor for the first time), has become strained. We saw during the Covid-19 pandemic how they weren't working constructively, so the party in blue will do what it can to pounce on any crises any of those devolved administrations are going through. 

Scotland has been the prime target for the Conservatives, and Labour, for some time. Over the past decade or so, the SNP has thrived north of the English border. It overcame a failed independence bid in 2014 and setbacks out of its hands such as European Union membership, where the party - and Scotland as a whole - convincingly backed Remain. Despite this, the party is a dominant force, having the greatest number of Scottish MPs in Westminster and is the ruling organisation in Holyrood. Labour and the Conservatives often play second, third, or sometimes even fourth fiddle, as nationalism conquers all.

However, the past year has seen the SNP tested in rather unprecedented ways. In March 2023, Nicola Sturgeon felt the need to resign as First Minister, reportedly over her role in the apparent mishandling of a financial pot which was meant to be used for another independence referendum. We are led to believe that the money instead was partly spent on an expensive campervan. Her husband, and former SNP Chief Executive, Peter Murrell, was recently charged over this, meaning the saga will not go away anytime soon.

Elsewhere, Sturgeon's successor, Humza Yousaf, had found himself in various pickles. It started with the passing of a Bill where, amongst other things, transgender men and women were protected against 'hate crime'. Of course, that is the measure shouted about the loudest. Those opposed to the law say that women aren't getting the same protection and are therefore in a more vulnerable place. That being said, I'm sure it'd be implemented fairly and that the Bill itself is a sensible approach to ensuring the safety of all citizens. Sadly, the system had already been abused by people clogging the 'hate crime complaints' inbox on day one.

In addition to this, the Green Party - who signed a cooperation agreement with the SNP after the Scottish elections in 2021 - announced it was to step away from it and sided with the Conservatives in a vote of no confidence against Yousaf. It took issue with the fact Yousaf made decisions that went against the agreement, including the watering down of key climate targets. Labour, meanwhile, went a step further by holding a no confidence vote against the entire Scottish Parliament, which was unsuccessful. Yousaf felt cornered and his authority was undermined, so he resigned as First Minister. John Swinney has now taken over, with a tough task to make sure things are calm enough to ensure the opposition parties aren't calling for his head too.

Upon following these dramatic developments, the cynic in me leapt to the SNP's defence. UK-wide, Labour has momentum after decent local, mayor and Police and Crime Commissioner election results, and hoping it continues in the upcoming general election. The Conservatives want to do anything to show political muscle, no matter how wimpish the party's tactics appear. Quite tragically, both are pure opportunists and what they're doing isn't just tacky, but I cannot help but feel this will all backfire on them. Voters in Scotland can look beyond the faux outrage as they had done in the aftermath of the independence and EU referendums.

Combining the SNP's crises and Labour's good results, the latest polls look positive for the party in red. While the nationalists look set to lose seats, we cannot say for certain that the predictions will prove to be true by general election day on 4th July 2024. These polls have underestimated the SNP in the past. It is also worth noting that the new constituency boundary changes will mean that the number of MPs in Scotland is to be reduced from 59 to 57, proving more difficult to predict any outcome.

Also, I can only imagine a significant proportion of Scotland's voters will not want their choices questioned by the big cheeses south of their border. Many of them acknowledge the challenges within the SNP's grasp, such as health and education, which have shown some signs of dwindled progress. Yet, they equally appreciate that the nation hasn't been given sufficient additional financial support from Westminster to help the Scottish Parliament tackle these issues. Other devolved nations and cities have also suffered, and poorer hospitals, schools and infrastructure have become a nationwide problem.

The Conservative government has spent so much time inflating the issues of the devolved nations rather than treating them as adults. From David Cameron in 2010 to Rishi Sunak today, successive Prime Ministers would rather not work with SNP or Labour, so instead give them little hush money and pretend that the problems in the devolved nations and cities are purely their problem and not Westminster's. 

The failure to develop any meaningful relationship will backfire. We may see a scenario by this summer that the ruling parties in Westminster and Holyrood remain the same and we are back to square one. My message to their respected leaders is a quick one - cut the stubbornness, sulking and ignorance. Do that, and devolution will thrive, and the UK as a whole will benefit. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...