Skip to main content

World leaders reaching dead end to stop Putin

Vladimir Putin (Image: CNN)

It's difficult to offer an alternative perspective to what's going on in Ukraine right now. The widespread anger and anguish over the attacks in the eastern European country by Russian forces are views I share deeply. But I want to have a go, at least, in offering alternative solutions so the nation can reach a state of equilibrium once more. At the moment, world leaders are busy questioning how we got here and in doing so, are scratching heads and slapping wrists. It's easy to argue that there's nothing more they can do, however, there probably is. 

I start with where I feel the responsibility lies. On the one hand, the European Union hadn't done enough to boot Russia out of a key financial system despite warnings of growing hostility by Putin's government. Yet, the UK and US are being criticised for not doing enough to deter Russia from its plans to invade. I truly believe the entire West were in utter denial; surely, they thought, Russia won't actually use military force to occupy its innocent neighbour? Sure, troops had been edging closer to the Ukrainian border for weeks, but we're so used to Putin's government being insanely intimidating and stubborn, they felt he wouldn't be so stupid enough to actually attack. But, he has, and as I write this, thousands of innocent lives are being lost.

Sadly, it has been coming. Russia has been on Ukraine's case for years - Putin protested against Ukraine's potential NATO membership, and in 2014 used force to annex Crimea. The powerful European countries and United States, for too long, bowed to pressure and successive Ukrainian governments had been left without sufficient support as a result. Global leaders should justifiably be disappointed in their actions, and unfortunately, I don't see Russia being stopped unless tangible, robust action is taken.

I wasn't around when the Cold War happened, but I feel this is completely different. Russia is a shadow of what USSR was, and Putin isn't good at hiding the fact that he wants to roll back to the 1980s. The best countries can do at this point is impose sanctions, but they've done this for years and stopping banks and oligarchs from accessing invaluable assets had never stopped Russia from misbehaving. Now blood is on Putin's hands.

But let's be honest, there's nothing more that the UK, US or Europe can do alone other than economic sanctions. Russia isn't part of G7 and it's excluded from key global negotiating tables. The last thing the West needs to do is to impose robust military action, otherwise we may as well declare World War III. I'd like to think we're a long way to that point. We've relied so much on Russia with its key assets, the invasion of Ukraine could already shoot up petrol prices just weeks before the 'cost of living crisis' really hits UK homes.

Literally the only route away the West can get Russia to think twice about causing further damage is to sleep with another naughty boy of the world - President Xi of China. Now, China has already backed Russia over its recent NATO protests, and probably won't have anything to do with Ukraine diplomatically. But on one hand, Ukraine's fate is bizarrely in China's hands should Xi dramatically wish to change tone. 

World leaders need to think outside the box. No more big 'telling off' words because they mean diddly squat - I echo what I said in 2018 in light of the Salisbury poisoning about this. Putin is more than happy to be cast as the stereotypical Russian villain we see in too many Hollywood films. Yet, the moment a powerful ally of Putin tells him that what he's doing is catastrophically wrong, and imposes their own punishments, then he may listen and stop, but I won't hold by breath. That won't happen in the immediate future, so in the meantime, we need to see things once thought unprecedented. 

The United Nations need to step up that much further and four further actions should be forced through; an agreement to a ceasefire is first and foremost, the second is to push Ukraine's membership to NATO - whether Putin likes it or not, better late than never. Third is for all countries to officially recognise Russia as a 'rogue state'. I'm stunned the White House hasn't begun the process of doing that already. And finally, if Putin's attacks are 'illegal', someone find the international law that's broken and send him to The Hague. It's time he and his reckless regime to be held to account, and done properly. There are obstacles to achieving any of these. However, start the process now and Ukraine will be safer once more, which is what its citizens and the world needs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

Now isn't the time to choose a favourite baddie

Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu (Image: Financial Times) I have been rather reflective of late. The global news agenda is dominated by powerful people doing unimaginably awful things, or at least capable of doing so - and they are seemingly given a free pass, having their evil justified, trying to find a reason why their actions aren't that bad compared to the 'other side'. And this is driving me absolutely mad. The less I hear from Benyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and others, the better this world will be. Here we have, at least three cunning maniacs, at it for their personal gain to dominate countries, nationalities and ideologies. Farage has no power, but he is being tipped to be the next UK Prime Minister , for no good reason at all. He gets a few votes from those bored of a Labour government, and critics start getting giddy. Trump thinks of himself as a puppet master, and through his crippling tariffs and mafia-like tactics, is sending his country an...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...