Skip to main content

The future of our young people has never looked so uncertain

Coronavirus: I can't give school reopening date, says Gavin Williamson | Tes
Gavin Williamson (R) with Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Image: TES)

In 2015, I argued that a Conservative government would never find a way to woo young people when they were excluded in key investment announcements and cut life-saving services. Fast forward five years and the Tories continue to find ways to really peeve off our youth. 

What has the government done this time? In my eyes, the ministers are guilty for trying so hard to say to students that they're on their side, to then achieve the total opposite. When the Covid-19 pandemic began, it was clear that the health and education systems were to be severely tested. Thankfully, for the time being, the NHS has gone through the past six months without feeling overwhelmed or in a position of collapse. Of course, the Health Service faces challenges over the coming months, with a possible second spike of Covid-19 cases, an expected backlog of mental health and cancer referrals and the start of flu season, which killed more than 20,000 people in the UK last year.

But it has been our schools that have struggled throughout this current crisis. Back in March, schools were forced to close in an instant despite initial government resistance. Exams were cancelled which almost felt like a government ploy to make young people happy about their summer holidays starting early. Yet, the announcement only created anxiety and confusion, which intensified when A-Level results were calculated by a dodgy algorithm, reportedly downgrading thousands of students. Uproar from parents and students forced Westminster to u-turn and ensured teachers were given the primary voice of their pupils' futures.

Then came the question of whether children would return to school full time after the summer holidays. It is clear now that this is the case, but with localised lockdowns occurring in different parts of the UK, there is never a guarantee that schools will remain open - this depends on the terms of the lockdowns. There is also no guarantee that when a school closes, it'd be done with prior warning.

All this could have been avoided. Had schools been given more time to prepare for a pandemic, teachers could prepare the delivery of virtual lessons better and ensured that pupils had the resources to continue their education at home without missing important lessons. They could have even found a way to facilitate GCSE and A-Level students to take their exams, meaning their final grades would be reflected on performance, not prediction. The rest of Europe were ready in February, the moment the World Health Organization raised alarms, and you don't hear stories about their education systems falling apart.

As a result of this mess, young people are missing out on the chance of fulfilling their true potentials. Yet at the same time, I wouldn't point the blame solely on Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, who has practically been the only minister able to defend the government's decisions in public during this summer period. True, it's his job to improve the education system, even during unprecedented times. However, without clear direction and guidance from 10 Downing Street, Williamson wouldn't have found himself in the sticky situation he finds himself in now.

Education was a secondary focus for the government. The Tories' initial key focus was to ensure the economy didn't tank. Today, the UK is in recession but actually, the figures could have looked a lot worse, had it not been for the freedom Chancellor Rishi Sunak was given. The furlough scheme and 'Eat Out To Help Out' proved extremely popular and potentially steered many organisations away from oblivion for the time being. 

These have made Sunak very popular, but I question how his actions in recent months ultimately benefitted young people. Not only that, but he and the Treasury have other challenges to contend with, including the increasing desire by employees (particularly those with families, i.e. not necessarily young people) - and employers - to adopt a work from home culture. BP plan to close its London headquarters as the firm recognises its offices aren't being used as they use to. Sunak may not think this is a major issue now but empty High Streets and buildings can see even more job losses, and the economy sink that much lower in the long-term.

Whether the working from home trend will last, I can guarantee that if it did, it will cost young people dearly. As someone under 30, I consider some of my colleagues to be my closest friends. You can't properly acquaint with new colleagues via Zoom. Where else, other than school, will young people make friends that aren't family members? You can argue Scouts or Girl Guides, but their futures are uncertain too - and have been for a while.

The so-called 'new normal' is hindering the future of our children. And while we should be focusing on preserving their futures, we are instead in uproar when they breach Covid-19 guidelines. Selfish some may appear to be, but what else are they going to do? There is so much PlayStation they can play, or Instagram to browse. Not every child has access to a laptop or a tablet to be educated at the same pace as those who have. Not all have gardens to embrace the outdoors, or live near acres of open space. Their confidence are at an all-time low and the government can do so much more to secure their prospects. Downing Street can start by not relying on Gavin Williamson or Rishi Sunak to perform miracles. Young people may not vote Tory in their droves, but that shouldn't stop a Conservative government form measured strategies that allow young people to thrive in a post-pandemic world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced