Skip to main content

Coronavirus exposes Britain's independence struggles

Nicola Sturgeon warns Boris Johnson over 'potentially catastrophic ...
Boris Johnson with Nicola Sturgeon (Image: The Herald)

If you look at the situation in most countries around the world, coronavirus (Covid-19) is largely controlled and a sense of normality is returning (with some magic social distancing sawdust sprinkled on top). In Germany and South Korea, football is back, followed by other countries over the coming weeks. Across the Mediterranean, borders are opening so people can consider going on holiday without needing to quarantine afterwards. And China has opened its factories once more. Of course, the virus is still around and, as I write this, the Americas, as well as parts of Asia and Africa are suffering pretty badly, notably the United States and Brazil.

Another country that is still enduring this virus to a catastrophic effect is the UK. The country has been in an official lockdown since mid-March, and while there are some signs of a decrease in the daily number of cases and deaths, plans for the next steps are proving to be a real problem. This is laid bare thanks to the complicated, confusing and conflicting messaging from Westminster, exposing the country to a situation which didn't need to be this sticky.

But I truly believe the UK government's response to Covid-19 is (mainly) sticky because it is fixated by the urge of being different to what other European countries are doing. This pandemic is the first big challenge Britain has faced since leaving the European Union in January, and the Conservatives want to do all it can to convince a divided nation that it can handle anything alone. Even though it has been made evident how EU members have worked effectively, hand-in-hand, and now see light at the end of a very long tunnel, Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his cabinet opted against following workable strategies and imposed a lockdown later, mass testing later and are allowing the economy to influence scientific judgement.

I sympathise with the predicament Johnson's government is facing when it comes to the economy. First post-Brexit impressions are vital in his eyes, and there is a sense of competitiveness with the rest of Europe in terms of who gets out of this crisis with the least number of bruises. No longer does Chancellor Rishi Sunak and his team want over seven million workers relying on the well-received furlough scheme. No longer does it want more people signing up for Universal Credit because so many have lost their jobs. And no longer does it want to lose another 2% in the economy in the next quarter, nor see huge dips in levels of productivity and retail sales, as we've seen in recent weeks.
Boris Johnson leaves intensive care | News | The Times
Johnson clapping for key workers (Image: The Times)

I understand and appreciate the importance of the economy moving and the willingness to see the positives. And you can see the desire Johnson has shown in trying to handle this crisis by spending so much time praising people doing social distancing and gushing over the NHS enough for us to be applauding nurses and other key workers every Thursday evening. He can also talk all day about how amazing it is that there are hundreds and thousands of tests available, even though they are not all truly accounted for.

These are plausible reasons to feel hopeful and thankful in these difficult circumstances, and we want to feel rather bouncy too. But the Prime Minister cannot justify his positivity when currently, literally hundreds of Britons are dying every single day because of the virus. Covid-19 hit France, Italy and Spain to the point they were getting more than a thousand passing away at one point. But these figures now go down to a much smaller handful a day. When I read The Times, which highlight the top ten of most new cases, the only European nation to be in there constantly in recent weeks - other than the UK - is Russia. This cannot be left ignored.

Unfortunately, when Johnson speaks, it appears only relevant to the welfare of those living in England. Due to devolution, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales are setting their own lockdown rules, which are of varying levels. If you follow the Welsh news for example, the Senedd has announced that the lockdown easing will be determined by a traffic light system. Scotland's Holyrood has implemented a 'phasing' system. These are a contrast to what Boris Johnson unveiled on the 10th May and because of this you can see the strengthened desire from the devolved governments to be completely independent from what is decided in Westminster. Scottish First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, who doesn't hide her feelings on Scotland's future in the UK, must be relishing this opportunity to show the country can go it alone.

To say I'm frustrated with the whole situation is an understatement. It is clear to me that none of the British nations want to work together and form a 'one nation' approach Boris Johnson insists he's implementing. And there is little desire from Westminster to allow knowledge and learnings to be given by other countries who are reaching the other side with far fewer casualties. And in the same breath we cannot allow ourselves to blame Covid-19 on the World Health Organization (WHO) who warned us about the virus impacting the globe since January, when China started getting cases - while I'm here, there's little point blaming China either.

I must confess that I, like many other Brits, underestimated the virus. At the start of March, when other countries were closing schools and shops, I was ignorant enough to believe UK wouldn't be impacted as bad as China had at the time. By the end of February, I attended a pop concert and I know people in their thousands who went to various sporting events. But we only went by the limited and expert-light guidelines Westminster plucked up in thin air.
Amid a global pandemic, Cheltenham Festival surviving all four ...
Cheltenham Races drew in big crowds (Image: The Telegraph)

With that in mind, we cannot allow ourselves to blame the 150,000 horse racing enthusiasts for flocking to Cheltenham Races days before lockdown was confirmed, nor should we allow ourselves to blame UEFA for allowing Atletico Madrid fans travel to Liverpool just as when the Spanish government was considering a lockdown. And I don't wish to point fingers at Westminster for acting late, however, it did take until the first few deaths for Johnson to take Covid-19 seriously when every other government took it seriously as the first 'positive' case was confirmed in their respected countries.

The government can recover from this, and I hope it does. As lockdown looks to ease over the coming weeks, one major challenge for Westminster to overcome is the moment when the Prime Minister can buoyantly announce we are able to eat in restaurants, attend concerts or travel abroad (with social distancing measures, I'm sure). How many will go straight to doing these things without an ounce of trepidation? How many will be unemployed and therefore not afford to keep the economy running as we like? How many will have anxieties of going outside for anything more buying a pint of milk (as a spike in mental health-related cases is being predicted due to us staying at home almost all day every day)?

And will these questions be answered differently in the devolved nations, depending on when they decide to ease the lockdown? The trust in government is decreasing by the day and with a vaccine possibly not being found until years from now (some say one may never be found), clear answers to the above questions are vital, so that both wellbeing of the public and economic growth go hand-in-hand.

Where does post-Covid leave devolution? While I have supported the concept of devolution in the past, the virus has tested my patience on it. I feel the governments in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are abusing their powers and should have put their anti-Westminster agendas to one side, on this vital matter. Trust me, I am not a fan of Johnson's government and how it is handling the crisis either. But for the world to turn in one piece, there are times where you will need to work closely with associates that don't hold your views on how the world turns. Your opportunity to leave the UK should come after the crisis, and not played with during.

What all UK nations have ignored is the notion that everyone is going through the same global pandemic - 'global' being the keyword here. It will be a calamity to go your own way during a major crisis like this again, simply because you can. And I sincerely hope Johnson realises that just because UK isn't an EU member any more, it doesn't mean he cannot go to them for help and advice. Without global cooperation to a global crisis, why bother? Don't want to listen to me, then at least listen to former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has been there when it comes to combating a global crisis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We've got the whole world, in Trump's hands

Donald Trump is cornering a willing Keir Starmer (Image: Getty Images) I yearn to visit the United States one day. I have it all planned out - seven cities across seven states, at least three nights in each. And each seven locations have meaning, influenced by my interest in TV, film, music and politics - plus a bit of sunshine and beach in the middle. In my mind, it will be the ultimate adventure, perfect for me, someone who isn't big on travel beyond European cities. However, I face two obstacles to this US trip - one, finances. I totted up how much it would cost me, and if you consider flights, hotels, food and other spending money, it will cost around £5,000, five grand I do not have and probably won't have for a good while. And secondly, the politics, which keeps reaching new levels of volatility. So much so, if its President, Donald Trump, carries on, we'll be comparing the US to North Korea and Iran.  I may sound extreme, but when you consider incidents like the deat...

Done right, digital IDs can save lives

Sir Keir Starmer has a challenge to convince people over digital ID plans (Image: The Guardian) If we're to treat survey results as gospel, I find myself in the minority on a big debate. It appears I am one of the very few in support of a 'digital ID' . It had taken me a while to come to this conclusion as, since the idea was explored under Tony Blair's government in 2005, I really wasn't sure what the point of the concept was. But 18 years later, I feel that an identification of some digital kind is necessary, and potentially lifesaving, as I'll explain here. The digital ID has been brought into the British political limelight again thanks to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. He wants to bring them in on a mandatory basis, as a way of proving we have a right to work in the UK. It forms part of his cunning plan to halt illegal migration and illegal labour - similar schemes are already in place abroad and are said to be doing well. According to a government pres...

Only an urgent EU return can save Britain's future

Sir Keir Starmer needs to be bold, and introduce a swift EU return (Image: Yorkshire Bylines) I don't know what has been more sobering - the latest UK election results or their subsequent commentaries. If we are to believe in any press speculation, Britain may be looking at welcoming its fourth Prime Minister this decade almost as soon as I press 'Publish' to this article. The frenzy and franticness of British politics have reached a new level, and the more I read into it, the more worried I am about the future. To summarise these recent weeks, current Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer has been under severe pressure over his handling of the government's appointment of Peter Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States last year. We know why it happened - because, at the time, Starmer wanted anything to appease the American government led by the unpredictable Donald Trump who, back then, only started declaring economic wars against allies through crippling tariffs. If an...