Skip to main content

Our muddled relationship with race


Image result for racism rally uk
'March against Racism' rally in London (Image: Mirror.co.uk)
When politicians and councillors in power come up with a plan to invest billions of pounds in rebuilding communities, they do it with the best intentions. Take a look at London these past 20 years, for instance. Shoreditch, Stratford, Croydon and Greenwich are completely transformed, bringing businesses of all sizes and sectors into areas once seen as crime hotspots.

The problems in the areas I mentioned above largely originate from social inequality, leading to many living in poverty and endure lifestyles that are proven dangerous and tragic. The finger-pointing around these circumstances expose unwelcome stereotyping aimed at both the victim and perpetrators. While we'd love the media to talk about the process, or journey, to how such incidents occur, the reality is that they will put emphasis on the skin colour of both parties, their current employment status and counting the number of GCSEs they didn't pass. No proper context involved whatsoever.

This cycle has been a sad theme for decades and last year saw this escalate, particularly in London, which saw reported levels of homicide increase. Yet, it hasn't just been the victims and perpetrators put under the short-sighted spotlight, but also the capital's Mayor Sadiq Khan. He can talk about the Metropolitan Police lacking resources and losing frontline officers all he likes, but talking louder are cynics like Boris Johnson who say he's either being too soft on certain ethnic minority communities, or blaming anyone but himself. It cannot be denied that at least some of this finger-pointing has a tinch of racism.

Image result for sadiq khan
Sadiq Khan (Image: The Independent)
Stereotyping in this way is currently happening at an unacceptable pace, and they are becoming blunter in tone. Too often before we've heard how 'black kids are knifing other black kids', how 'these Eastern Europeans are taking jobs from British people', or how 'terrorism is only caused by Islamic men'. In the past year we have seen a sharp rise of people who follow the Jewish faith being unfairly targeted both online and offline, and it's great to see the likes of Rachel Riley and Tracy Ann Oberman being vocal about this (even if I somewhat disagree with their political finger-pointing).

In all instances, every stereotype and racist reference has zero substance and a huge dollop of malice, regardless of whether the individual or group inflicting this 'mean it' or not. Yet, despite such rise in attacks, I find myself highly confused about why people do, or say these things when we Brits, proudly, live in a tolerant country.

I mean, I'm sure those who aim their racism and stereotype remarks to BAME communities jam to Jay-Z, watch every Denzel Washington film or want to put 'visiting the Caribbean, Dubai, India and South Africa' on their bucket list. Furthermore, I'm pretty sure that a large portion of those who inflict their anti-Semitic views on others absolutely love films made by Adam Sandler, Ben Stiller and Scarlett Johansson. And I bet those sceptical of Eastern Europeans enjoyed a jolly long weekend or stag/hen do in Prague or Budapest. I can never understand how people could avidly follow someone in the entertainment industry then completely offend their existence.
Related image
Nelson Mandela with Muhammad Ali (Image: Mirror.co.uk)

My confusion escalated again in recent weeks as the British public voted Nelson Mandela, Muhammad Ali and Martin Luther King as among the most iconic figures of the 20th Century over the likes of Sir Winston Churchill, Emmeline Pankhurst and Marie Curie. The first three figures I mentioned here fought so hard against racism all their adult lives. What would they think about the blunt stereotyping we see on social media then to be given such honour and accolade at the same time?

We cannot underestimate the level of racism we're witnessing online and offline. The reported rise of hate crime in the UK is frightening. While there are no figures which portrays the levels of hypocrisy we see from those who utter such racist remarks, I can imagine most of us are guilty of this in some way or another.

One of the key problems stem from the original discussions (online) we're seeing between those who are either too elevated on their moral high grounds and those who 'say it as it is' without any tact - supposedly two sets of people with highly differing views. Both sides here are in the same league in my eyes. It all starts with an honest and innocent debate, then it takes one to blow it out of proportions and be personal. Others would follow and the debate turns ugly and never-ending.

Why can't we all appreciate the individuality of others and respond to people with respect? We're all human and life would be utterly dull if every one of us are the same. I received the results of my Ancestry DNA recently and found I had a significant percentage of Irish, Turkish and Italian in me, when I always said to myself that I'm half Welsh and half Iranian. Can you imagine someone who hates all black people discover they're a tenth Nigerian or Jamaican? Can you imagine the reaction of a Holocaust denier, or a 'proud' Islamophobe, being twelve percent Israeli or Arabic respectively? At the time when we need each other the most, through economic tensions and political divisions, let's all get along, aye? There is only so much politicians can do, particularly when, individually, have been victim to such abuse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...