Skip to main content

Our muddled relationship with race


Image result for racism rally uk
'March against Racism' rally in London (Image: Mirror.co.uk)
When politicians and councillors in power come up with a plan to invest billions of pounds in rebuilding communities, they do it with the best intentions. Take a look at London these past 20 years, for instance. Shoreditch, Stratford, Croydon and Greenwich are completely transformed, bringing businesses of all sizes and sectors into areas once seen as crime hotspots.

The problems in the areas I mentioned above largely originate from social inequality, leading to many living in poverty and endure lifestyles that are proven dangerous and tragic. The finger-pointing around these circumstances expose unwelcome stereotyping aimed at both the victim and perpetrators. While we'd love the media to talk about the process, or journey, to how such incidents occur, the reality is that they will put emphasis on the skin colour of both parties, their current employment status and counting the number of GCSEs they didn't pass. No proper context involved whatsoever.

This cycle has been a sad theme for decades and last year saw this escalate, particularly in London, which saw reported levels of homicide increase. Yet, it hasn't just been the victims and perpetrators put under the short-sighted spotlight, but also the capital's Mayor Sadiq Khan. He can talk about the Metropolitan Police lacking resources and losing frontline officers all he likes, but talking louder are cynics like Boris Johnson who say he's either being too soft on certain ethnic minority communities, or blaming anyone but himself. It cannot be denied that at least some of this finger-pointing has a tinch of racism.

Image result for sadiq khan
Sadiq Khan (Image: The Independent)
Stereotyping in this way is currently happening at an unacceptable pace, and they are becoming blunter in tone. Too often before we've heard how 'black kids are knifing other black kids', how 'these Eastern Europeans are taking jobs from British people', or how 'terrorism is only caused by Islamic men'. In the past year we have seen a sharp rise of people who follow the Jewish faith being unfairly targeted both online and offline, and it's great to see the likes of Rachel Riley and Tracy Ann Oberman being vocal about this (even if I somewhat disagree with their political finger-pointing).

In all instances, every stereotype and racist reference has zero substance and a huge dollop of malice, regardless of whether the individual or group inflicting this 'mean it' or not. Yet, despite such rise in attacks, I find myself highly confused about why people do, or say these things when we Brits, proudly, live in a tolerant country.

I mean, I'm sure those who aim their racism and stereotype remarks to BAME communities jam to Jay-Z, watch every Denzel Washington film or want to put 'visiting the Caribbean, Dubai, India and South Africa' on their bucket list. Furthermore, I'm pretty sure that a large portion of those who inflict their anti-Semitic views on others absolutely love films made by Adam Sandler, Ben Stiller and Scarlett Johansson. And I bet those sceptical of Eastern Europeans enjoyed a jolly long weekend or stag/hen do in Prague or Budapest. I can never understand how people could avidly follow someone in the entertainment industry then completely offend their existence.
Related image
Nelson Mandela with Muhammad Ali (Image: Mirror.co.uk)

My confusion escalated again in recent weeks as the British public voted Nelson Mandela, Muhammad Ali and Martin Luther King as among the most iconic figures of the 20th Century over the likes of Sir Winston Churchill, Emmeline Pankhurst and Marie Curie. The first three figures I mentioned here fought so hard against racism all their adult lives. What would they think about the blunt stereotyping we see on social media then to be given such honour and accolade at the same time?

We cannot underestimate the level of racism we're witnessing online and offline. The reported rise of hate crime in the UK is frightening. While there are no figures which portrays the levels of hypocrisy we see from those who utter such racist remarks, I can imagine most of us are guilty of this in some way or another.

One of the key problems stem from the original discussions (online) we're seeing between those who are either too elevated on their moral high grounds and those who 'say it as it is' without any tact - supposedly two sets of people with highly differing views. Both sides here are in the same league in my eyes. It all starts with an honest and innocent debate, then it takes one to blow it out of proportions and be personal. Others would follow and the debate turns ugly and never-ending.

Why can't we all appreciate the individuality of others and respond to people with respect? We're all human and life would be utterly dull if every one of us are the same. I received the results of my Ancestry DNA recently and found I had a significant percentage of Irish, Turkish and Italian in me, when I always said to myself that I'm half Welsh and half Iranian. Can you imagine someone who hates all black people discover they're a tenth Nigerian or Jamaican? Can you imagine the reaction of a Holocaust denier, or a 'proud' Islamophobe, being twelve percent Israeli or Arabic respectively? At the time when we need each other the most, through economic tensions and political divisions, let's all get along, aye? There is only so much politicians can do, particularly when, individually, have been victim to such abuse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced