Skip to main content

Person of the Year 'Suits' royal-to-be


http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/171127140648-02-harry-meghan-engagement-1127-full-169.jpg
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle (Image: CNN)

Meghan Markle never received the global appreciation she truly deserved. Unless you watched Suits on Netflix, or lived in the United States long enough to fully notice the models on Deal or No Deal, you wouldn't really recognise Ms Markle as a renowned superstar.

Meghan's rise to universal fame has been relatively instant. She wasn't the main character in Suits yet she used her then limited fame to inspire other women around the world through World Vision and other massive charities. She was also an on-demand model and consumer ambassador. But all of this was heightened to astronomical levels after she met her English prince, Harry.

Soon to be fifth in line to the throne, Prince Harry went through one helluva rollercoaster when it came to his relationships before meeting his California girl. His image - not just in the love department - was anything but royal. During the noughties in particular, he was subject to crazy tabloid headlines, being a zero one minute when getting involved in wild, boozy Vegas parties, and hero, by joining the Army, the next.

However, it was Harry's relationship status that was consistently high on the agenda of enthusiasts. Big brother William had it all sorted rather early with his squeaky clean marriage with Kate Middleton, while speculation surrounding who would be Mrs Prince Harry escalated. Who'd have thought it being actress Meghan Markle?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000234452008.jpg?strip=all&w=687
Prince Harry at Invictus (Image: The Sun)

Their relationship became public in 2016. It was meant to be private for a lot longer than it was, but with obscure photos of the pair together, kiss-and-tell stories left, right and centre, and social media going in overdrive, an official, yet subtle, press statement from Kensington Palace put 'Meghan Markle' and 'girlfriend' in the same context.

The couple never look back since. September this year confirmed that this courtship was more than a fling, when both went out together during the Invictus Games, to which he created. It was only a matter of time they'd take it to the next level, and after approval from both families, their engagement was announced.

While many now are counting down the days until their wedding day - Saturday 19th May 2018, by the way - I continue to admire how endearing this relationship is. I mean, we're not in 2018 yet and this wedding is the key contender to being the biggest event of the year. No other high profile wedding will compete, that's for sure. I genuinely wish the best for them - especially for Meghan Markle.

It is no question Meghan is my choice for 'Person of the Year'. TIME Magazine chose the group of women who uncovered the darkest side to Hollywood and beyond. We could have chosen survivors of Grenfell Tower who deserve plaudits, as too Ariana Grande who did so much to pick Manchester up after the terrorist attack after her pop concert in the city. However, I want to point out Meghan's personal sacrifices as a result of her decision to marry Prince Harry, because they're hugely significant.

Regardless of how long her relationship with Prince Harry will last, Meghan's life has changed forever. For one, she's made a drastic career change unlikely to be overturned. By being a Duchess, she's waved goodbye to her acting and modelling. She'd have gotten away with his had Harry not been as high profile as he is today. Mike Tindall could, as his wife - and Harry's cousin - Zara Phillips is considerably lower in the royal food chain meaning they could continue their jobs without maximum press interference.
https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/suits-4.jpg?w=446&h=299&crop=1
Meghan Markle in 'Suits' (Image: Deadline.com)

For Meghan, it's different. While it's unlikely we'll see King Henry IX (as Harry would be known), the couple will spend more time performing official royal duties than she would travelling home to Los Angeles having a chinwag with fellow cast members. Though, she knows what she's signed up to, otherwise, she wouldn't make such a commitment, right?

Not only her career would change, so would her religion and citizenship. She's hasn't been baptised and isn't a British citizen. And seeing is grandmother - The Queen - leads the Church of England, Meghan must be baptised and 'confirmed' before her nuptials. It is worth mentioning she's a divorcee too. Prince Harry is certainly ripping up royal tradition, isn't he? Good!

I admire Meghan Markle for making this move. She worked incredibly hard to get to where she was in the entertainment business, but now faces her biggest challenge yet. The acting industry is nothing compared to the royal shenanigans that lay ahead. By becoming a Duchess that high up in the royal food chain, she'll soon realise there's more to the role than red carpet appearances.

Meghan comes into the royal scene completely inexperienced. She's not been with Harry two years yet, and hasn't basked in palaces for as long as, say, Kate Middleton or Princess Diana did prior to their respected marriages. Meghan does however, have arguably more life experience - she's 36, a year older than Kate, who was 29 when she married Prince William.

I'm intrigued to find how the next five months and beyond transpires for Meghan. She's a proven tough cookie and held powerful views before adopting her new royal ways. Now she has a duty to contain them and learn a fresh way of living. I'm sure she'll be absolutely fine, so long as she avoids scandal and takes what the British press say with a pinch of salt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced