Skip to main content

If May goes, so shall Corbyn


https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/1/590x/secondary/Theresa-May-Jeremy-Corbyn-770901.jpg
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May have big decisions to make (Image: Daily Express)

There has been a lot of talk about Theresa May's future as Prime Minister. Since June's general election, so-called experts have unleashed their inner Mystic Meg and, to this day, are still predicting her political demise. She has so far survived the summer backlash and the bruising conference season. Many today guess May won't last beyond the New Year.

At this stage, I beg to differ. It's difficult to say when May does eventually tender her resignation, but one thing is for certain - the Conservative Party is going through a sticky period. It is an organisation associated with an apparent calmness that lures voters with their reportedly sensible policies. They're not used to dealing with internal crises, so all this chaos and rebellion is completely new to them. The issue of Europe has been a catalyst for this, yet, even today, they struggle to agree on domestic policy.

The Tory's tactics are currently reactive. Many of the Party's ministers weren't enthused with the way it negotiated with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) to form a minority government. The likes of Anna Soubry, Nicky Morgan, Ken Clarke and Grant Shapps have spoken vocally against some of their Party's key positions. In the cabinet, Chancellor Philip Hammond and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson don't see eye-to-eye and if rumours are true, Theresa May is offered an ultimatum - reshuffle and oust either Hammond or Johnson, or leave.

The government is in disarray, which is damaging for the UK's positioning domestically and abroad. The markets are still investing but under the pretence that any minute from now, it's about to pop. The pound against other currencies continues to plummet. Relationships between British and allied ministers are showing cracks. May isn't just clinging on to her job, but clinging Britain against falling from a cliff edge.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/opinion/2016/07/19/103604492_Cabinetmembers-LETTERS_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqZsnXEbNrMXboTkQUnkbE_YWtomp5VRd3kwAlUkjUxj0.jpg?imwidth=450
Davis, Rudd & Hammond (Image: Daily Telegraph)
It's occasionally healthy to cling on to something, so long as you know it's both worth it and it's good for that individual's wellbeing. In this scenario, May's primary reason for clinging on is because she doesn't want Jeremy Corbyn to be Prime Minister. Some of May's colleagues have accounted this, hence a number of her loyal ministers - Amber Rudd, David Davis and Liam Fox to name a few - are clinging on to her.

Before the last general election, even before Labour's sudden surge in the polls, it was clear the public preferred what the Party in red stood for, yet would rather May over Corbyn to lead the country. This shift has changed slightly in recent months, however there are a number of influential political commentators left unconvinced. Ultimately, the primary reason Corbyn is the preferred leader today is because of how the press are, one-by-one, turning their backs on May's vision and handling of important affairs.

Despite May's downfall, Corbyn's situation hasn't really changed since before the summer. His approval rating outside Party circles remain in negative territory and some Labour ministers aren't overly pleased he is still leader. He's certainly proved critics wrong, yet I can only see his situation similar to Theresa May's, should he do anything misconstrued in the near future.

My only prediction is that Corbyn will 'outlive' May, but if Labour want to be in government - when that eventuality occurs - Corbyn would also depart his leadership role. His departure won't be performance based, yet purely tactical.

I've called for Corbyn to go before. Though in the two years he's led Labour, my perception of him has completely changed. He moved the Party in a way that got even the 1997 supporters excited. Without the glory, he almost single-handedly brought the glory days back to a Party which seemed dead and buried. His way of thinking is now resonating and echoed to not only his peers, but to the opposite benches too. He is more influential than many are led to believe. His impact is admirable.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2017/09/25/141736088_Copyright-AHeathcliff-O27Malley-All-Rights-Reserved-not-to-be-published-in-any-format-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqDp9MCtbW0RkcmZwvf11UT3GH_sPIAWjrrdGM3cDjpbo.jpg
Corbyn with Starmer & Thornberry (Image: Daily Telegraph)

The reality however is that, in this climate, neither May or Corbyn are any closer to winning an overall majority - no tactical voting will be ensure this either. Luckily for both parties, there is hope - so long as they seek it, and approach it with care.

The situation is easier for Labour. The unity is much stronger today compared to six months ago - and that's an understatement. They have the likes of Sir Keir Starmer and Emily Thornberry climbing up the ranks, who please both the so-called 'Corbynistas' and 'Blairites' while at the same time offering a certain charm that impresses even the most sceptical of commentators. Plus, both are the most consistent in explaining Labour's positions in key policy areas.

For the Conservatives to succeed, they need a leader that can do so with their own instinct, as opposed to being led by a result or outcome - which May has done. It isn't working and even people who voted 'Leave' in last year's EU Referendum aren't impressed by her strategy in cancelling UK's European Union membership. That said, it's very tough to identify who would do a better job than May in her Party. I cannot list anyone who would have that ability to satisfy the Party's current needs. Right now, Tory MPs are either pro-Europe or very anti-Europe. If the Party wants to get back on track, they need a balance and form a like-minded cabinet. It worked well for David Cameron in 2015, until the infamous referendum.

While the British public won't desire Party-centric leaders, for a good Prime Minister of a country which has over 65 million people, an ideal candidate would need to prove they can form and organise the Party they lead. May isn't likely to leave anytime soon because there is too much drama going on for her to drop that type of bombshell. Only she knows when it's the best time, yet, with EU exiting negotiations intensifying and fresh obstacles along the way, walking away could make matters worse. Regardless, Labour need to be ready for any outcome and once it does, Corbyn will have is own ultimatum to make.

Comments

  1. What a load of waffle.
    You don't like Corbyn, I get it, but there's no evidence suggesting he's going anywhere any time soon.
    Good journalism brings facts and evidence together to produce new insights and/or make a case for something. I'm sorry, but here you're just sharing your personal musings and not giving me any reason to care what you think or why.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, you must have misinterpretted. I do like Corbyn, I respect him too and he's been a golden asset for Labour. He may not leave anytime soon, but that doesn't mean that May won't either. Not trying to be a journalist, just offering a different perspective.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced