Skip to main content

It's time to think radically about guns

http://www.lbc.co.uk/mm/image/35109.jpg
Gun crime statistics, provided by LBC

I'm sick of hearing about widespread violence on the news day in, day out. It's happening far too often now and it's being highlighted with greater emphasis. These past two months alone has seen mass-murders in Orlando where dozens were killed in a nightclub; in Nice, a man took a lorry and ran over hundreds during Bastille Day, a short week after; a deadly failed coup in Turkey claimed more lives. And as I write this, Munich are in the mourning process after multiple shoppers were needlessly killed on a casual Friday afternoon.

These four particular atrocities have something significant in common - the culprits used a rifle of some sort to shorten the lives of hundreds and cause emotional pain for thousands more. I'm not a believer in coincidence, and I'm not the sort who goes out of my way in actively agreeing with Piers Morgan. However, when I absorb the news and hear these tragedies, I cannot help but think that guns must cease to exist. The world must unite against the damn things once and for all.

Of course, banning guns altogether can be seen as an unpopular choice by millions of owners around the world. It'd also be a highly unpopular decision in the eyes of the firearms industry and its workers. In 2013, manufacturers in the United States made an astonishing 10.35 million rifles during that calendar year, many of which were imported to different parts of Europe. A massive 88 out of 100 people in the States owns a gun. And an average of over 11,000 people die as a result of gun homicide in the 50 states. I can't help but feel that these statistics alone are absolutely frightening.

https://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-NR438_0427wa_G_20110427180356.jpg
Guns widely sold in supermarkets like Walmart (Image: WSJ)
It is easy to argue that the majority of those who own these guns don't use them. In America, plenty of owners say they keep it in a safe place and haven't touched it since they bought it. It's become part of their culture to possess one - guns are considered normal there. And with its use comes horrific circumstance. You're ten times more likely to die by shooting in the US than in any other developed country. These statistics shame a country in all honesty and it's a huge shame that the House of Congress has done nearly nothing about this issue.

Now, many people who know me realise that I'm one of Barack Obama's biggest admirers - I really am. He's inspired a generation in the States to believe in themselves and has turned the country around from the mess left by the George W. Bush administration, transforming the health industry and economy. But it's the gun industry that would cast a shadow on his terrific premiership. I can see he has tried to strengthen regulation. I have seen the emotions he has expressed, calling for such change. But as the President of the most powerful country in the world, he's felt absolutely powerless in trying to convince many pro-gun Republican politicians to make his policy a reality.

The House of Congress' attitude isn't likely to change overnight. With the general election only a quarter of the year away, our focus is on the Presidential candidates' views on them. Hillary Clinton has pledged to confiscate firearms from enthusiasts (so similar to Obama's view) while Donald Trump wants school teachers and clubbers to own one and carry it around like it's their house keys. These are two different attitudes and depending on the voters that turn up in November and which Congress members are therefore elected, I can't see this constitution changing anytime soon.
http://keyassets.timeincuk.net/inspirewp/live/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2010/02/deer_stalking_rifle_woods.jpg
Someone preparing to shoot a Deer (Image: Shooting UK)

In my view, people who have purchased, or want to purchase a gun, has that urge to harm. Many claim it's for self-defence, however, no owner isn't going to keep it as a pet and bullet-less. This may sound like a simplistic perspective, but there are countless of other ways to express your frustrations about someone, or something. I'd even go as radically far as heavily regulating violent visual content in film, TV and video games, paintballing, water pistols, archery and skeet shooting. All users of such activity, however fun they see them, need to be checked and ensure they're participating for recreational purposes rather than practicing to harm.

For people like me in the UK, we're lucky to have a terrific security system whereby gun crime is among the lowest in developed countries. I'm proud to say we've banned fox hunting and I hope that one day we can ban people shooting deer and pigeons too. Our bigger issue is knife crime, sadly. For that, education is key. It isn't an epidemic but you can defend yourself through safer means without thinking you're taking part in a sword fight. You can't defend yourself when a bullet comes towards you at hundreds-of-miles an hour.

Of course, gun crime is horrendous anywhere in the world and it's unfair to pinpoint this problem with the United States. However, as the country is hugely influential and we often hear the 'American Dream' phrase buzzing in our ears when we associate with them. But their general attitude towards rifles is reflected in global society. It's the same as the West's attitude to nuclear weapons. If you don't want the crime to happen elsewhere, then why advocate it closer to home? It's easy for an American to mourn what has happened in Orlando, or the isolated cases where police officers and disadvantaged members of US society are attacking each other, but if 88 out of 100 people in the country own a gun of some type - drop yours first and then have the right to criticise government policy and mourn those victims.

Action speaks louder than words. I can sympathise with French President Francois Hollande for having to constantly address his nation about the horrendous shootings under his leadership, and hear his passionate pledges to clampdown on terrorism. Yet, clearly, shooting down suspected terrorists in their international bases isn't working. I don't see any global strategy, through members of G20, NATO or United Nations sitting together and ensure these mass killings come to an end. My ban and radical change is just one solution - unworkable it may seem but working together, coming up with viable solutions is the best way forward. Otherwise, terrorism will thrive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced