Skip to main content

To distinguish a 'person' and 'personality' in context

Angela Merkel (Image: Washington Post)
How can we define what a 'person' or 'personality' is? You may have your own answers but you can't help but express these without stating fact. We have our own opinions and perspectives on what these terms mean, or through personal experience, we define the sort of 'person' or 'personality' that we are. We also may be narrowing down the both words mean by defining the 'good' and 'bad' of each.

I have been thinking a lot about these two terms particularly this week as two accolades have entered the limelight which have gotten me to put my analytical cap on. The first accolade I want to go through is TIME Person of the Year. Whoever wins this, whether it is an individual or group of people, have spoken of their honour to be considered an influence in the only way they can.

Whether this influence has had a positive impact on you or not, that is another point entirely. But this year, the accolade went to Angela Merkel. The German Chancellor beat off Americans Caitlyn Jenner, who this year campaigned for transgender rights after having publicly gone through the process of a sex change, and Donald Trump who announced earlier in the year that he wants to run for the White House as a Republican. You cannot conclude whether these people as an individual 'person' is good or bad because we all have our own views and agendas. However, I cannot help but completely understand why they were shortlisted in this magazine for this award.
Syria crisis, Donald Trump, Caitlyn Jenner (Image: wncn.com)

Merkel has had one busy year. With Germany seen as the most powerful country in Europe, they have been heavily relied upon in regards to the near collapse of Greece who Merkel announced billions of Euros worth of bail out cash to save them from bankruptcy. Merkel can be seen as the leader who lent France a shoulder to cry on through their difficult year, in addition to trying to keep David Cameron happy somewhat as he attempts to negotiate a 'better deal' for UK before his country potentially votes to leave the European Union come 2017. Let us not forget Germany's contribution to the refugee crisis, as Merkel announced that 800,000 people fleeing war zone Syria could reside in the country after the influx of people travelling to the West peaked during the summer. She has proved to be a humanitarian, negotiator and a Chancellor all at once. Winning TIME Person of the Year to me was the least she deserved.

Merkel isn't going to win everyone over for her work in 2015, of course not. But how she dealt with global pressures and media hounds during time of uncertaincy has shown that she is a 'person' as opposed to a 'personality' which to me has a different meaning. To me, personality is about feelings and emotions, about generating a certain presence that being a 'person' comes out of it. Donald Trump is a 'personality'. While he isn't confirmed a US Presidential candidate yet, his 'personality' and views takes away the 'person' aspect of it all. He'd only be a 'person' if he doesn't let the 'personality' dominate.

This leads me to defining 'personality' and if you've been watching the news in the UK, you cannot escape the controversy surrounding his year's BBC Sports Personality of the Year. One nominee in particular has been grabbing the headlines for the reasons only this individual can interpret whether it is positive or negative - Tyson Fury. The boxer had only just two weeks ago won a series of Heavyweight titles against current world champion Wladimir Klitschko. This alone has given BBC the privilege to shortlist the Englishman for their coveted sport's award.
Tyson Fury (Image: ITV)

Despite this great achievement, this victory is overshadowed because of his reported extreme views. In a short space of time, he has come up with quotes that appear homophobic and sexist having compared those who are homosexual as to being a paedophile, while describing heptathlete Jessica Ennis-Hill, also nominated by BBC this year, as someone who "slaps up good" in a dress. These comments have caused widespread offence with 100,000 already signed an online petition asking him to be removed by the BBC for nomination.

What hasn't helped matters is that Fury defends his comments and BBC are sticking to their word and insists he should remain on the shortlist. The broadcaster wishes that the public recognised him for his sporting achievement rather than his personal viewpoints. This is understandable yet I cannot help but sense he is likely to be jeered whenever the focus is on him during the award ceremony later this month.

That said, I do think that he should remain as a nominee for BBC Sports Personality of the Year. His sporting achievement is great, yes. And yes, I wholly disagree with his highly offensive views that have cast a shadow over his victory. However, he does have a 'personality'. He is a showman and his persona gives him that initiative to pursue further with his views. Sports stars in general are personalities. Wayne Rooney, for example, is more likely to win BBC Sports Personality of the Year than TIME Person of the Year because he is a 'personality' and hasn't gone far as to being a key global influence other than some children who want to have his haircut on them.

I suppose to me, it is about impact and the sense of perspective. Is David Beckham we see in the public eye a 'person' or 'personality'? How about Tiger Woods? It entirely depends, to me, on what that individual has done at that specific time. Angela Merkel can be a 'person' one year and yet next year can be out of that limelight and into something that makes her a 'personality'. The same applies with Tyson Fury. If he took his religious beliefs, that he uses to justify his controversies, however extreme they may be, into physical practice and carries a certain level of influence then I may be inclined to say he is a 'personality'. But we can't officially say whether that individual has 'good' or 'bad' personality, or is a good or bad person without fact, or even without a great degree of seriousness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...