Skip to main content

Westminster must back Scotland like a parent would their 18 year old leaver

http://www.scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/980w/public/2013/11/21/scmp_news_alex_salmond_081113.jpg?itok=zrqG6fYZ
Alex Salmond (Image: scmp.com)

Can you believe it is less than six months until Scotland make their biggest decision in generations? It is hard to believe that it is that close considering it seems like only yesterday when their First Minister Alex Salmond first announced his desire to make Scotland an independent country. Now we're edging closer to Thursday 18th September 2014, people in every corner of the British Isles are contemplating life without Scotland as part of the United Kingdom. It is hard to escape the discussions. Even if you think you have, there is bound to be someone on television or someone you pass in the street that has even the slightest of Scottish accents, you cannot help but think about the prospect of calling them a 'foreigner'.

It is an equally daunting thought that hundreds of thousands of 17 and 18 year olds are, as we speak, receiving offers from their first choice University as they start thinking about a new chapter to their lives which is to take place six months from now. Their parents or guardians must be undoubtedly proud of their sons' or daughters' achievements but at the same time, are imagining life without them as they leave home for the first time - a feeling many do not want to comprehend.

September is evidently a big month for a lot of us. A lot of pride and possible new beginnings beckon. Pride, because, in the parents' perspective, they have done all they could do raise their children in a way that they can stand on their own two feet and embrace living life independently. These children will meet new people, attend meetings and lectures without getting that dreaded wakeup call from their parents. They have the chance to keep control of their finances, learn how to budget without having 100% reliance from relatives. These are new beginnings any teenager can grasp and parents, who are ready to let them go, can be proud of the way their boys and girls have developed into men and women.

Letting go is a hard thing to do and I cannot imagine what the British government is thinking right now. Although most of the Scottish population back the campaign which would "Keep Britain together", there is still a precious portion of those who are undecided. Some may not decide until the day of the referendum. The government has picked their side (they want Scotland to stay a British nation) which is understandable. They are like the parents of millions of 18 year olds who have that element of fear of their child's wellbeing when they ride solo. There is a heavy degree of reluctance - what can Westminster do without Scotland, a country they nurtured and supported for so long? It may seem unimaginable but it may be inevitable.

Scotland has passed their tests. They have proved they have excellent and invaluable ties with thriving countries and have the capability of decent financial management, despite the Royal Bank of Scotland showing their displeasure of the referendum. When you look at economic statistics, it seems clear that they can do it alone and yet still cope.

Westminster needs to keep an open mind about Scotland leaving. I can only imagine that's the stage parents are in at the moment. They hear their child is likely to study Higher Education, and that University will be nowhere near from home. They are naturally delighted for their children, but still have those worries about their decisions. Is the city of the University safe? Are the surroundings enough to satisfy their child's needs? Those are the usual questions, but they are still open to the prospect of their child leaving home. They are curious. I can imagine what my parents were like six months before I moved to Bangor, North Wales. My mother came with me for an overnight stay during a blustery October. After basking in the Gogledd and asking sensible questions, we both knew it was the sort of place I wanted to spend three years living in. David Cameron has to be at this stage now or he'll never accept the fact that Scotland could go it alone. He has to accept, like thousands of parents nationwide, that his baby wants to pack its bags and enjoy the freedom.

Westminster should be proud of how far Scotland has come. The Scots have, in the past, been portrayed as these bag-piping, kilt wearing troupers of the north. This social stereotype is no longer the prime focus. They have made a grown up decision and they have to acknowledge that being independent will not be an easy ride. I understand why Westminster are upset and it would be a blow if they were to let go of Scotland. However, they must respect the Scots' bravery and let them enjoy the world of adulthood, should they vote "Yes". The last thing they should do is condemn Alex Salmond and develop their friendship further - Westminster must guide them through the good times, and during challenging times.

If Scotland does vote for independence, Cameron should hug the country, congratulate them and say "We're here should you need us." After three years, who knows - perhaps Scotland may be a boomerang child and return as part of the UK. If that were the case, this should be supported by Westminster, whoever resides in 10 Downing Street by then. Or maybe, Scotland will be just fine and will become a strong ally for Britain. Who knows, maybe by 2017, Scotland may move on from the pound...?

Should Scotland become independent, they cannot dump everything that's partly theirs, such as the currency. Becoming independent is just a start of the process which will not take overnight to complete. They need the status, and then the tiny details would be applied. Whatever their decision, it will be the right one because it is theirs, and theirs alone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced