Skip to main content

Media still has long way to combat gender stereotyping

http://www.limepictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/programme-thumbs-towie.png
The Only Way is Essex (Image: Lime Pictures)

ITV is a television network that Britain can be proud of. They have produced some of the finest dramas, documentaries, news coverage and day time shows. Coronation Street is the world's longest-running soap opera, enjoyed by nine million people every episode. Let's put it this way, there is at least one programme on any of ITV's six channels (including "The Store") that someone likes. If you don't like anything ITV produces, then one must question if you have ever watched anything on their channels?

I admire ITV as their six channels are very distinctive. For example, ITV offers mainstream shows like Coronation Street, Downton Abbey and Jeremy Kyle Show which are aimed towards the modern family. ITV2 attracts the younger audience who are into the celebrity culture while ITV3 focuses on the older audience, showing repeats of classic shows like Colombo and ITV4 offer a wider variety of films, documentaries and sport attracting a more niche audience. Let's not forget to mention CITV which is aimed at young children, and The Store is for those who fancy their chances in their games.

Detailing each target audience by each of ITV's channels shows a clear trend. They offer something for people by their interest. If people like to know how their favourite A (or Z)-List celebrities are doing, then they know which channel to switch on to. ITV2 served a valuable purpose by providing shows which did this. However, the channel may lose this purpose.

I came across a story recently that they are to produce a new free-to-air channel with the purpose to aim towards young women. The channel ITVBe will feature shows such as The Only Way is Essex (TOWIE) and Real Housewives. At present, they are shown on ITV2, but executives have decided to make this move "to develop what is currently part of the ITV2 schedule – reality and non-scripted shows, which are very popular with young women and housewives with kids – into a distinct channel proposition, aimed more squarely at that audience."

This decision, in my eyes, is a daft one as it seems they are heading back to the dark ages where people are judged by their gender. When I talk about the "dark ages" of the media industry, I only mean this time 40-50 years ago. Men had significant advantages over women in the media. It was very rare to see a woman present a TV show but for those who did, received much smaller recognition than male presenters. The first female newsreader was Barbara Mandell of ITV in 1955 but TV had been going on for decades before. Women in the media were shadows.

Thankfully, this has all changed and women have greater recognition in the media spotlight. Britain is lucky to have arguably the greatest female presenters, journalists and directors. From Gloria Hunniford, Angela Rippon and Moira Stuart, to Fiona Bruce, Natasha Kaplinsky and Caitlin Moran, to Holly Willoughby, Emma Willis and Alex Jones - the list is endless. Over the past 10-15 years, gender stereotypes have been a decreasing issue and for those who have thought of it as a problem, are strongly condemned.

The media industry has led the way to ensuring that stereotyping men and women would not happen and that has been down to those who have demanded common sense. A journalist is now more of a woman's job than a man's while both genders can produce breathtaking and award-winning broadcasting programmes. Not only that, we are now seeing an increase in women watching sport, and at the same time, it is now seen acceptable to see a man religiously watch reality shows, a thought which was previously laughed upon. These are the changes which are widely celebrated, which leaves me baffled as to why ITV announced their intentions to launch a channel aimed at women. Just because TOWIE may arguably targets the young female audience, why should a channel literally state this?

The move won't stop men from watching ITVBe, but it's a ridiculous move for ITV executives to make. They have implied that 'men don't watch shows like that', while women 'only watch shows like that'. It's almost like ITV saying men should keep to watching men in boots and women watch women in heels. This is what people had campaigned against. We're in the 21st Century where people could watch whatever they like without someone saying 'but isn't that a girl's show', or 'isn't that too blokey for you'?

This move is embarrassing for a very-well respected television network which has done so much good for the British public. But they have stooped to a level we all hoped we moved on from. They should show that media continues to lead the way in stamping on stereotypes. The media has become so powerful, we rely on it on a daily basis, whether it's through the internet, billboard advertising or newspapers. From this point, media has done well not to segregate what men watch, and what women watch. However, what ITV have announced proves the industry still has a long, long way to go. But despite the exceptional progress, let's not start looking back now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced