Skip to main content

Two isolated incidents shouldn't diminsh the reputation of the respectable police force

Everyone loves a good cop drama. I can think of a few, and I'm sure you can come up with a list of some which tickle your fancy. They portray heroic and dedicated police officers, plotting their moves to find the crook who commit unthinkable actions. They are seen as the good guys who solve crimes. Yes, some crime dramas have dodgy officers, but they'll be dealt with - piece of cake.

Even in real life, most of the time, police officers do their jobs with pride. They patrol the streets during football games, clamping down on hooliganism. They work during the night so the drunk don't act disorderly. Some visit schools and lecture children on how important are their safety. It is clear they do their very best to ensure that their community is safe.

I have always respected the police force. I have always been lucky to live in places which aren't crime-infested, and I guess it's all down to a close-knitted community that the police, councillors and the like, make sure of. They have been finding it difficult of late because of the government cuts, but they've still managed to keep crime levels as low as possible. However, of late, there have been isolated incidents which have overshadowed the entire force's reputation. In this calendar year already, we have seen two incidents involving the police which has seen the outspoken public lose their trust in the people who they need to trust. These two incidents have been ongoing for the past couple of years but only recently, both stories have taken a dramatic turn.

The first story which took a drastic turn was the case of Mark Duggan. Mr Duggan died in summer of 2011 when he was shot by a police officer. At the time, the police argued that Duggan had a gun in his hand and that he would have done something damaging. Not risking anything, police took the split-second initiative and took a life. Whether Duggan handled a gun the moment he died, or not, is still being debated today. The tragedy not only pointed the finger towards the police force who failed to handle a complicated situation, but it also caused nationwide riots which dominated headlines two-and-a-half-years ago. Of course, the riots went completely out of hand as originally, it was meant to be a peaceful march across Tottenham.

Since then, the Duggan family have been campaigning for justice as they firmly believed that Mark was unlawfully killed. However, only very recently, after 29 months, the jurors at his inquest suggest that he wasn't, and that he was a potential threat on the night he died. They took to account that he was part of a gang and had a criminal record. They hadn't discussed the extent of his criminal record and there is little proof that he was a violent man.

The decision by the jury angered the Duggan family. On Saturday, they held a peaceful protest, but this time it remained peaceful. They believed Mark was no threat during the time of his death. The public have also been disgusted by the verdict as some campaign groups argued that the incident is racially influenced. Some say, if Mark Duggan was white, he would still be alive today. Not only do I disagree with that point, I think it's sad we have to even think that any incident as tragic as this would be racially influenced.

What happened to Mark Duggan was sad, and possibly avoidable and unjustified. Nobody deserves to die in these circumstances - however, every precaution has to be considered by the police and Mark Duggan. Whether Mark had a gun in his hand, or not, during the time he was shot, is irrelevant. What is relevant is that there is enough proof that he did carry a gun on that day. The police officer who shot Mark Duggan will have to live with him/herself. It was a freak moment of madness and hopefully, at some point, we can move on.

The second story which took a dramatic turn had been ongoing for over a year. While people were suffering from the Olympic-hangover, the relationship between politicians and the police reached fever pitch. In 2010/11, the police force had to be cut with thousands of jobs vanished - something which was detested by the Met and everyone else associated with the force. However, in September 2012, an alleged heated discussion occurred between an officer and MP. Then Chief Whip, Andrew Mitchell, apparently had a row with an officer and during this conversation, the Conservative politician called the officer a "pleb" - hence, the "Plebgate" scandal.

It was an incident which saw Mr Mitchell leave his job - David Cameron accepted his resignation after public outrage. How dare a politician go name-calling a police officer. But Mitchell had people on his side and had campaigned tirelessly to ensure their Tory MP would have his name cleared of any wrongdoing. This scandal became the public focus for 18 months and saw a number of arrests and interrogations by fellow MPs and officers. But only recently, has a witness, who initially said saw the entire conversation which led to Plebgate, admitted to not telling the truth. The other witnesses also gave false accounts of what they saw. One has accepted a misconduct charge earlier last week. They heard nothing of the kind and orchestrated a lie which saw Andrew Mitchell's reputation tarnished.

With both stories, you can argue that the police officers involved were at fault and you may be right to believe so. However, I do not see why the entire force would be punished because of the minority. Certainly, those at the top could have handled situations better. They hadn't made their lives easy. But on the other hand, they don't feel any guilt, so why should anyone else? These unfortunate incidents are two bad situations out of thousands of great deeds the police do every day to keep Britain safe. Politicians should keep their opinions to themselves and ensure that the police get the credit they deserve.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...