Skip to main content

World leaders must be realistic about their 'green' dream

In Britain, we are constantly being reminded of how much we like to indulge. Experts are already predicting that most of us will be 'obese' in the next ten years. Hearing people say things like this is alarming so some take drastic measures to either lose the fat they have or maintain their 'ideal' physique. In recent years, dieticians have come up with cooky ideas which help people achieve their physical aim. For example, we have the Atkins Diet where people opt for eating lots of meat and very little carbohydrates. One diet which has caused a stir, particularly this year, is the 5-2 diet where you eat the 'normal' requirement of food (2,000 calories for women and 2,500 for men) for five days in a week while for the other two days, cut the calorie intake to a quarter of the normal level (500 calories for women and 600 for men).

We take our bodies seriously, more now than ever before due to media pressure - glossy magazines showcase 'inspirational' weight-loss stories while television channels are constantly broadcasting food programmes in addition to body image-centric shows like 'Britain's Biggest Loser' and 'America's Next Top Model'. The body is our temple and we must take care of it because we if we don't, then we will essentially destruct.

However, it is argued that dieting can prove to be useless. If you follow one strict regime and lost many pounds, then instantly start another diet, all of a sudden all your hard work may have gone to waste. It's not only frustrating but it can have a negative impact on your internal organs. The lung's function could be tested, heart becomes fatigued and your respiratory system left in a spin. Not enough people are warned that the effects of dieting can be fatal. But the same can be said to those who cross a quiet road without looking right, then left, then right again.

The point I'm making is that some of us go extra lengths to look good rather than feel good. So if we take drastic measures to looking good, why can't we go that further mile to turn our televisions off from the mains rather than on standby? Why can't we all have our lofts insulated? We're told doing these things will benefit the environment and therefore create a better living for our future generations.

The environment is a big issue in modern society. The threat of global warming is a major cause for concern. We have been warned that the ice caps in North and South Poles are melting meaning coasts across the world will be underwater by the next century. Putting this into perspective, should predictions be correct, millions of lives will be at risk. The globe will reach crisis-point.

World leaders take the environment very seriously. They are willing to spend billions, almost trillions on developing renewable energies. They erect wind turbines, build nuclear power stations that would heat homes the green way. Governments spend millions on advertising campaigns informing people to do their bit and wash their clothes at 15 degrees rather than 30-40, cycle to work rather than take your car, and replace single glazing windows for double to keep the heat in. Putting thing like that sounds so easy and some of us are doing the things I have mentioned. However, we have this constant voice in our minds telling us we're not doing enough and therefore, the world is coming to an end.

I admire the world leaders' vision and I do believe that most of them are in agreement that our attitudes have to change when it comes to the threat of global warming. But in order for their billions to be money well spent, they need everyone to cooperate. They need everyone to do the same thing and play a significant part in protecting the environment. To get everyone - or at least the vast majority of people to change their lifestyle dramatically - is highly ambitious, yet potentially dangerous.

There are so many of us in the Western world who indulge and for us to be asked to diet environmentally in almost an extreme way, we could be doing the world greater damage. We want the luxury but we're now told to have a 'new' luxury which, although it statistically benefits us and our future generations, it cannot be proven unless we all speak the same volume when it comes to the environment. Actions speak louder than words and it's difficult for that to happen. Not all of us diet, and not all of us are green-minded, and as we have freedom and a mind of our own, we choose not to diet or turn 'green'. Not many embrace wind power, some may prefer to use coal, but it is impossible for politicians to single-handedly prevent water levels from rising.

I always like to do my bit for protecting the environment but if we're all going to change our lifestyle, we are simply delaying the damaging effect of global warming. Whatever happens, the climate will always change - and not even wind turbines could break the mould.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...