Skip to main content

The awareness of gender discrimination in British football is a blessing

In recent blog posts, I have a habit of writing about topics because of a recent documentary I watched. On this occasion, this trend continues and today, the topic I am to discuss is something I've written about in the past. Here's a clue - last year, I wrote about Richard Keys and Andy Gray moments after they were caught off camera blatantly discriminating assistant referee Sian Massey just because of her gender. I recall saying that they mustn't judge on people on a job that they couldn't do better in and forgot to mention they deserved to be punished despite being really popular "role models" at Sky Sports. They were deservedly kicked out of Sky even if they forcefully apologised and Gray admitting earlier this year that he considered killing himself over the situation. Let's just say that what they said ruined their career, despite the pair moving to Talksport radio.

Moreover, I recently watched "Sexism in Football?", a BBC documentary presented by Gabby Logan and it told me that the Gray/Keys incident is not isolated. I watched this documentary closely. Being football mad and half Iranian, I knew the extent of the gender gap in football. In Iran for example, females are forbidden to attend football matches in stadiums. Some have challenged and protested against this particular restriction. The film Offside (2006) was highly acclaimed in various film festivals such as in Berlin and Toronto and although the film was enjoyable, it did open my eyes to the daunting extent of the reality females get in an environment they want to be part of.

The film Offside very much reminded me of the BBC documentary. The male figures in the Iranian film (the security guards) wanted to let the girls in but they weren't willing to risk their lives in an enclosed society in the country. The girls disguised  themselves as boys, hiding their true identity - like in the documentary where the organisation "Women in Football" (WiF) was very little known to the avid football supporters and the so-called experts. On both occasions, the females are the boisterous unvoiced. This is an incredible shame. In the 21st Century, people had hoped that we had moved on from the "women stay in the kitchen" ideology and thinking more towards the fact not "all Muslims are terrorists". Same applies to Iran, people were hoping that the idea of not "the entire West are evil" was to be the case and that women can dress what they want without being frowned upon.

Let's not get off topic however the issue still lays to rest. I remember writing a blog post about Fifa banning the Iranian women's team from entering London Olympics qualification because the side wore religious head garments. It may not be that extreme in the UK however when I discovered that some football reporters were not allowed in the press room because of their gender, that I feel is discrimination at its worst. However, despite the documentary underlining the problems women face in football I feel presenter Gabby Logan and the males who were interviewed should be praised. Of course, the likes of Karren Brady and Jacqui Oatley deserve recognition also but they spoke from personal perspectives. Logan brought the issue up whilst those such as Lawrie Sanchez, Robbie Savage, Mark Chapman and Jonathan Pearce acknowledge the problems and open up to their opinions.

Football is highly publicised in Britain, as I have realised when writing up my dissertation. Recent debates arise such as racial discrimination, technology and political side to football. Homosexuality and gender are much more recent topics of discussion and the media are hyping this more now than ever before. Whether they are in support of the awareness or critical or it - either the case, at least people are aware. I have no problem with women getting increasingly involved in football. In fact, I encourage it. In a relationship perspective, it is always a bonus to hear of a woman's interest in sport discussions. It is kind of rare which is also an upsetting notion. It is always a misinterpretation that women "don't like football" but that's a complete myth. Unfortunately, the hierarchy in sports federations do not realise this. They must learn from tennis, horse racing and golf where women play a huge, influential part in the games. Therefore, enough women receive an opportunity to shine in areas they feel passionate about. For those involved in football, I am the one saluting to you, and not mocking you.

Nonetheless, debates such as gender are one of the reasons why I love football. Would you ever imagine federations of darts, cricket or rugby (male dominated sports) even consider having female representations? Of course, football is far behind in gender equality but creating a documentary about it is a big step towards a more equal and fairer society. Gender equality awareness will start from football as the sport is more widely known. Once that is sorted and women can feel less insecure, then it will be time to look at other occupations and spread the same message. Take politics for example - although Labour's Harriet Harman says there should be more women involved in politics, this needs to be emphasised. If you're asking me, Harman should lead Labour but again, I'm heading off-topic.

I hope you can see where I'm coming from. People in Britain gloat over the fact we are an equal nation with various faiths and attributes. Now it's time to improve on this. Let us not just give racism the red card but discrimination as a whole and British football could be a leader of this campaign. However, it is easy for me to say things will improve. This requires a lot of effort from football chiefs, players and management to clamp down on inequality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...