Skip to main content

Revealing government secrets could lead to disasters

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (left), Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

  "Help WikiLeaks keep governments open"

This is a clear, bold appeal which appears on the WikiLeaks website next to an image of the man behind it all, Julian Assange. The 40-year-old Australian former hacker and activist has won may awards because he unveiled various country government secrets since 2006, embarrassing the governments and delighting the public 'who demand the truth'. The awards he won include Le Monde Person of the Year and Amnesty International UK Media Award.

Earlier this year, he was at the centre of controversy by being accused of sexual assault and is living under house arrest at a mansion in Britain. He is currently fighting his worth suggesting he mustn't be extradited to Sweden, the place where he did the alleged assaults. It may sound complex but it's no thanks to his whistle-blowing website and his involvement with leaking government files. Perhaps the British government have "secretly" volunteered to keep him in their grounds so that he won't be able to reveal too much more which would give world leaders a headache?

It can be argued that he has caused some damage in world leading governments, meaning the public trust politicians less and less. He released over 250,000 US secret documents for Internet users to see - a lot of these documents mentioned Iraq during the wake of the 2003 war and the revelations surrounding the invasion. It's certainly life changing for millions and highly controversial but is it really in the public interest? It's hard not to forget the fact he was a hacker surely hacking is against the law? He can't have accessed this information easily. Regardless, he's making people happy which is all that matters.

Whatever happens, Assange and his WikiLeaks will never satisfy me. This week, Iran's plans to assassinate a Saudi ambassador in the United States were dashed by quick-reactions from the American authorities. It might have sounded like a heroic mission accomplished on the US behalf as they've stopped a potential terror attack, but I'm sure there's more to it than Iran causing disruption in a country they rival toward.

The relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia is rather love/hate. Historically, they have got along with each other well but since the Iranian revolution in 1979, politically they've been declaring a war-on-words with each other and things didn't help when last year, WikiLeaks revealed that due to Iran's controversial nuclear project, Saudi Arabia President King Abdullah urged America must attack them. It may have been almost 11 months since the story was leaked but with this Saudi ambassador visiting America, Iran would have spent all this time to plot a revenge.

I'm against Iran's plan to cause utter chaos in America but honestly, if it wasn't for Julian Assange, would Iran have made this radical decision to try and kill a Saudi ambassador in the States? According to the Huffington Post, the WikiLeaks founder "spurred" the Middle East uprising after the website said the leaders there have done wrong for the public. It all adds up. This year, Middle East has turned a dramatic corner, and we all think it's going to be a happy ending in the region. New governments there are emerging but will the new leaders instrument a prosperous Egypt, Tunisia, Syria in the future? It may be too early to tell but I'm not totally convinced.

I am in support of investigative journalism, but with the little trust we have on politicians, are tarnished due to some home truths, we won't be able to have settled governments. The leaking of the expenses scandal in the UK could have been one major factor to why we have a hung parliament today. In the US, Watergate scandal lost Republican some supporters but decades later, the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky sex scandal damaged Democrats' reputation. Because of acts of ignorance by the government, we do not know what to do.

So will I want governments kept open - maybe it's best if some talks and documents are kept quiet. No one would want to be phone hacked or publicly releasing love letters intending for just a couple to read, or do we?

Like this, like "The world as I see it blog" on Facebook. Or alternatively, follow me on Twitter @johnsalehprice

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The death of British middle-class sit-coms

After 120 episodes spanning 11 years, BBC One hit situation comedy My Family reaches its final hurdle this Friday evening. BBC One Programme Controller, Danny Cohen said the channel are searching for a new generation of comedies which will created a similar impact. "Now that all the Harper children have fled the nest we feel it's time to make room for new comedies on BBC One. I can confirm that the eleventh series, coming to BBC One later this year, will be the last," Danny Cohen, March 2011 Ben and Susan Harper, along with their children, Michael, Janey and up until series five, Nick are the well-known faces we are going to miss seeing on the occasional Friday nights. Robert Lindsay and Zoe Wanamaker have made their impact on the small screen as well as theatre appearances which made them the big stars they are today and I'm sure Daniela Denby-Ashe (Janey), Gabriel Thomson (Michael) and even Tayler Marshall (who played Janey's son Kenzo) have a big futu...
4 comments
Read more

Only an urgent EU return can save Britain's future

Sir Keir Starmer needs to be bold, and introduce a swift EU return (Image: Yorkshire Bylines) I don't know what has been more sobering - the latest UK election results or their subsequent commentaries. If we are to believe in any press speculation, Britain may be looking at welcoming its fourth Prime Minister this decade almost as soon as I press 'Publish' to this article. The frenzy and franticness of British politics have reached a new level, and the more I read into it, the more worried I am about the future. To summarise these recent weeks, current Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer has been under severe pressure over his handling of the government's appointment of Peter Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States last year. We know why it happened - because, at the time, Starmer wanted anything to appease the American government led by the unpredictable Donald Trump who, back then, only started declaring economic wars against allies through crippling tariffs. If an...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Piers Morgan Enigma

Piers Morgan - angel or devil? Ah, Piers Morgan. There is so much to say about the Good Morning Britain co-anchor, I felt compelled to boost his ego and dedicate an entire post to him. Right now, I cannot open my Twitter without seeing a new post from him. At the same time I cannot open my Facebook without reading a story about him on Digital Spy saying something that has divided social media users. It appears we know loads about Mr Morgan. We are aware of his feuds, with the list of people he's fought against longer than the Channel Tunnel - Jeremy Clarkson, Lady Gaga, John Cleese, and Ian Hislop to name a handful. He is also known to block anyone who shoot grammatically incorrect insults at him on Twitter. He's a fiery Aries, that's for certain. Yet, the deeply analytical part of my brain wonders whether his views make him a heartless man - perhaps an understated view from his critics - or an individual who has good intentions and a high moral compass. I think ...
5 comments
Read more