Skip to main content

Revealing government secrets could lead to disasters

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (left), Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

  "Help WikiLeaks keep governments open"

This is a clear, bold appeal which appears on the WikiLeaks website next to an image of the man behind it all, Julian Assange. The 40-year-old Australian former hacker and activist has won may awards because he unveiled various country government secrets since 2006, embarrassing the governments and delighting the public 'who demand the truth'. The awards he won include Le Monde Person of the Year and Amnesty International UK Media Award.

Earlier this year, he was at the centre of controversy by being accused of sexual assault and is living under house arrest at a mansion in Britain. He is currently fighting his worth suggesting he mustn't be extradited to Sweden, the place where he did the alleged assaults. It may sound complex but it's no thanks to his whistle-blowing website and his involvement with leaking government files. Perhaps the British government have "secretly" volunteered to keep him in their grounds so that he won't be able to reveal too much more which would give world leaders a headache?

It can be argued that he has caused some damage in world leading governments, meaning the public trust politicians less and less. He released over 250,000 US secret documents for Internet users to see - a lot of these documents mentioned Iraq during the wake of the 2003 war and the revelations surrounding the invasion. It's certainly life changing for millions and highly controversial but is it really in the public interest? It's hard not to forget the fact he was a hacker surely hacking is against the law? He can't have accessed this information easily. Regardless, he's making people happy which is all that matters.

Whatever happens, Assange and his WikiLeaks will never satisfy me. This week, Iran's plans to assassinate a Saudi ambassador in the United States were dashed by quick-reactions from the American authorities. It might have sounded like a heroic mission accomplished on the US behalf as they've stopped a potential terror attack, but I'm sure there's more to it than Iran causing disruption in a country they rival toward.

The relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia is rather love/hate. Historically, they have got along with each other well but since the Iranian revolution in 1979, politically they've been declaring a war-on-words with each other and things didn't help when last year, WikiLeaks revealed that due to Iran's controversial nuclear project, Saudi Arabia President King Abdullah urged America must attack them. It may have been almost 11 months since the story was leaked but with this Saudi ambassador visiting America, Iran would have spent all this time to plot a revenge.

I'm against Iran's plan to cause utter chaos in America but honestly, if it wasn't for Julian Assange, would Iran have made this radical decision to try and kill a Saudi ambassador in the States? According to the Huffington Post, the WikiLeaks founder "spurred" the Middle East uprising after the website said the leaders there have done wrong for the public. It all adds up. This year, Middle East has turned a dramatic corner, and we all think it's going to be a happy ending in the region. New governments there are emerging but will the new leaders instrument a prosperous Egypt, Tunisia, Syria in the future? It may be too early to tell but I'm not totally convinced.

I am in support of investigative journalism, but with the little trust we have on politicians, are tarnished due to some home truths, we won't be able to have settled governments. The leaking of the expenses scandal in the UK could have been one major factor to why we have a hung parliament today. In the US, Watergate scandal lost Republican some supporters but decades later, the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky sex scandal damaged Democrats' reputation. Because of acts of ignorance by the government, we do not know what to do.

So will I want governments kept open - maybe it's best if some talks and documents are kept quiet. No one would want to be phone hacked or publicly releasing love letters intending for just a couple to read, or do we?

Like this, like "The world as I see it blog" on Facebook. Or alternatively, follow me on Twitter @johnsalehprice

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...