Skip to main content

Why I will welcome the Pope to the United Kingdom

Tomorrow, history will be made. Pope Benedict XVI is to enter British soil - the first Papal to do so since 1982 by John Paul II. Benedict will travel to four cities; London, Birmingham, Edinburgh and Glasgow in four days. His intentions is to meet Protestant and Supreme Governor, Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister David Cameron. The 83-year old will be addressing the nation with series of masses. This visit however, will be the most controversial with Catholicism as a religion seems to be at a rocky patch.

So what is the big fuss with the Pope coming to the UK? Why do people such as Stephen Fry despise his visit? It's a long list which the media looks to increase by the day. The religion is portrayed as racist, homophobic and well, everything against equality. It is quite harsh that Catholicism is being pin-pointed this way. Not every Catholic is like that. And surely, Pope Benedict XVI doesn't think everything negative?

As a religion, Catholicism is very well known and is still loved worldwide. Ireland and Italy still take their Catholicism seriously and is more dominant than Protestant. Although Protestants and Catholics have their differences and attack each other via the media, it must be known that they believe in one person who has effected billions around the world - Jesus. It's another religious matter which must be looked at. Jesus would not have wanted this hatred and rivalry between religions. He was all for peace and harmony.

Less and less people attend church and it's obvious that young people disregard it. I have noticed that more people "don't believe in God" and are therefore considered as atheists. During my days in school, both primary and secondary, fellow students groaned, moaned and on occasions skipped Religion lessons. It's an important and highly debatable subject but unfortunately the 21st Century demands us not to attend church on Sunday morning's or synagogue's and instead wake up later and play on computer games. It's a viewpoint which although has to be respected, it would be useful to help children for the future to open their eyes and be proud of their heritage and religion will help them regardless.

It's obvious that there is a larger divide separates people who do and don't believe in either religion or God. It's a shame that people don't believe how the world was evolved. I only say that just to join a worldwide debate. It's a sensitive subject and I do believe that God did make the world.

Back to the main point, the Pope's visit will hopefully bring people back in faith and see Catholicism's good points rather than the bad. Their viewpoints are unintentional. They are also effected by the power of the media and judge people different than other's. Everyone interprets things differently and if someone doesn't share your point of view, it's cool to sit down and chat, discuss, debate and enjoy every one's company. It's not a big deal which a mass protest has to be formed. No one likes that.

It is also a worthy point that George Bush Junior made frequent trips to the UK. We were against his wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, his health system and the way he ruled the United States but we allowed him to come. We treated him like any other civilian, so why not do the same with Pope Benedict XVI?

Our hope is for the next four-five days to flow well without any problems, it's advised that we must respect that the Pope is here to visit and do some masses. He's not here to ruin or complicate anything.

Let's make this clear. I'm not a Catholic and do not attend church but I do believe in miracles and God created the earth by the Big Bang. So what I've written above wasn't for nor against Catholicism. I believe in respecting other people's point of view. If anyone disagrees with another, take it at your stride and for a more peaceful environment, do not react in a way which will cause even more problems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Done right, digital IDs can save lives

Sir Keir Starmer has a challenge to convince people over digital ID plans (Image: The Guardian) If we're to treat survey results as gospel, I find myself in the minority on a big debate. It appears I am one of the very few in support of a 'digital ID' . It had taken me a while to come to this conclusion as, since the idea was explored under Tony Blair's government in 2005, I really wasn't sure what the point of the concept was. But 18 years later, I feel that an identification of some digital kind is necessary, and potentially lifesaving, as I'll explain here. The digital ID has been brought into the British political limelight again thanks to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. He wants to bring them in on a mandatory basis, as a way of proving we have a right to work in the UK. It forms part of his cunning plan to halt illegal migration and illegal labour - similar schemes are already in place abroad and are said to be doing well. According to a government pres...

We've got the whole world, in Trump's hands

Donald Trump is cornering a willing Keir Starmer (Image: Getty Images) I yearn to visit the United States one day. I have it all planned out - seven cities across seven states, at least three nights in each. And each seven locations have meaning, influenced by my interest in TV, film, music and politics - plus a bit of sunshine and beach in the middle. In my mind, it will be the ultimate adventure, perfect for me, someone who isn't big on travel beyond European cities. However, I face two obstacles to this US trip - one, finances. I totted up how much it would cost me, and if you consider flights, hotels, food and other spending money, it will cost around £5,000, five grand I do not have and probably won't have for a good while. And secondly, the politics, which keeps reaching new levels of volatility. So much so, if its President, Donald Trump, carries on, we'll be comparing the US to North Korea and Iran.  I may sound extreme, but when you consider incidents like the deat...

Only an urgent EU return can save Britain's future

Sir Keir Starmer needs to be bold, and introduce a swift EU return (Image: Yorkshire Bylines) I don't know what has been more sobering - the latest UK election results or their subsequent commentaries. If we are to believe in any press speculation, Britain may be looking at welcoming its fourth Prime Minister this decade almost as soon as I press 'Publish' to this article. The frenzy and franticness of British politics have reached a new level, and the more I read into it, the more worried I am about the future. To summarise these recent weeks, current Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer has been under severe pressure over his handling of the government's appointment of Peter Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States last year. We know why it happened - because, at the time, Starmer wanted anything to appease the American government led by the unpredictable Donald Trump who, back then, only started declaring economic wars against allies through crippling tariffs. If an...