The JSPrice Perception

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w

Time for bold action, Prime Minister (Image: The Week) Sir Keir Starmer has been Prime Minister for two months and already The Daily Telegraph sound as though he's governed a dystopian Britain for a decade. I suppose the government do need an opposition of some kind, as the Conservatives seek a new leader. Who better to fill those shoes than the paper dubbed the 'Torygraph', led by editor Chris Evans, associate editor Camilla Tominey and their disciples.  Some of the column pieces that have come out of the media title have been bold to say the least. On 7th September 2024 alone, writers have accused Labour of being ' the stupid party ', not understanding ' the most basic rules of economics ', and that Starmer is ' the prisoner of Labour's Leftist factions ' and ' plotting a tax raid on inheritance '. These are quite telling words aimed at a government which, of the nine weeks it's been around, six of them have been summer recess. Duri

Giorgia Meloni and Emmanuel Macron (Image: Bloomberg/Getty) Before we entered the New Year, we knew that 2024 was going to be a big year in politics, and oh boy, we have not been disappointed. The past month alone has seen the UK welcome a new Prime Minister, confirmation that Joe Biden will be replaced as US President and France's Parliament given a significant shake up after the country's President Emmanuel Macron called a snap election in response to a bruising European election outcome for his party.  The European election aside, what we saw in the UK and France was that voters weren't being asked to vote for a party or an individual, but against others. The strategy worked, and we are likely to see a similar story in the US when the country heads to the polls in November. This is, largely, down to the resistance against the threat of history repeating itself. The apparent extremes of the traditional political spectrum have consistently done well in the polls of late an

Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer (Image: The Telegraph) The UK general election on Thursday 4th July has come at a time where the country is at a sticky crossroads. Never has its citizens felt so out of touch with politics, not helped by a government who had asked millions of undecided voters, with just six weeks' notice, to head to their local polling station and make a huge, collective decision. Even Conservative ministers were reportedly surprised when Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced a summer election when it was widely anticipated we'd see one in the autumn. But we should have seen this swift call coming. Sunak spoke to the nation from a very damp Downing Street on the day inflation went down to 2.3% (his target was to get it to 2% by election day ). He also wanted planes with 'illegal' migrants headed to Rwanda, and he got that approved by Parliament  in April 2024. With key 'pledges' through the door, you sense he felt buoyant enough to say let the peop

Left to right: John Swinney, Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf (Image: BBC News) Scottish politics has seen considerable turbulence in recent weeks. This has delighted commentators and politicians who oppose the idea of devolution or the Scottish National Party (SNP) more generally. I mean, after all, the UK general election is just weeks away, any excuse to try and deter the progress of Scotland's largest party. And any excuse to highlight the nation's problems and say that it shouldn't have more independent powers. Personally, I am more pro-devolution than against. I see its merits but I equally appreciate the need for the concept to reform. The problem has been for years, devolved nations and cities are largely led by parties who aren't the ruling party in Westminster so, naturally, relationships between the Conservatives and leaders in Wales, Manchester, Liverpool, London, and elsewhere, including now Birmingham (which has recently welcomed a Labour Mayor for the fi

Katharine Birbalsingh at her Michaela Community School (Image: Byline Times) At the moment, in Britain, there are really contentious and concerning debates being had about what's 'right' and 'wrong' for children. It has made me feel that I am from a fortunate generation, sandwiched between the kids raised in the 1970s and 80s who at school were very restricted and severely punished for minor reasons, and those in education today where there's too much overprotection and faux outrage. By comparison, my era - in the late 90s and 2000s, felt rather straightforward and dull. The faux outrage right now circles around religion and identity, which I'll address the latter later.  For quite a while I have been following the developments of Michaela Community School in north west London. In recent years, it has raised the eyebrows of education experts and political figures, many of whom in two minds as to whether the school's seemingly unorthodox approach is a go