Skip to main content

Westminster is too toxic for more change

Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng (Image: NPR)

Conservative MPs are playing a dangerous game with the UK. The cost of heating our homes and businesses has never been higher; their focus should be on working together, to find ways of keeping prices down, so millions won't worry about affording life's basics as the coming months get darker and colder. Their focus should be on tackling homelessness and on reducing carbon emissions. Their focus should be on everything else apart from what they're doing right now - fighting amongst each other and plotting to oust yet another Prime Minister.

We saw it with the Labour Party between 2015 and 2019. When Jeremy Corbyn was elected by party members, it wasn't the change his MP colleagues wanted, and they spent years making his life hell. History is repeating itself, this time for the party in blue. Liz Truss has been Prime Minister for a small number of weeks and - despite receiving enough colleagues to support her to be shortlisted in the Tory leadership election, and despite receiving 57.4% of the vote from party members - many are predicting she won't last at 10 Downing Street beyond Hallowe'en, or Christmas, if she's lucky.

It's absolute carnage at Westminster, and reckless. Tories used to be good at defending the indefensible. Since coming to power in 2010, they defended austerity remarkably well, they defended Brexit despite a stagnation of economic growth. They also defended their recent record on the cost of living, despite former Prime Minister Boris Johnson recently admitting he'd not done enough. They also did a terrific job in defending him as leader, until they realised there was a limit. And, of course, both him and his Chancellor Rishi Sunak - who lost the recent leadership battle - are among the favourites to replace Truss.

Truss has had no honeymoon period. Like anyone else in her position, she wanted one and thought it was going to happen before (now former) Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, announced their mini-budget. It was received disastrously; the financial markets gasped, the pound flopped and the Bank of England needed to intervene. They didn't react well to the reversal of the 1.25% national insurance hike Sunak introduced, the corporation tax freeze, and the cap of energy bills to an average of £2,500 per annum - a rise from £1,200 pre-April 2022, a rise from £1,900 post-April 2022 (not intervened by, yes, Mr Sunak) and a previously announced rise to £3,500 which, again, Sunak was happy to keep if he was leader. Perhaps most of all, the markets - and the rest of the country, in fact - were aghast by the announcement to reduce the top rate of tax from 45% to 40%. That's thankfully been scrapped, as too has the corporation tax freeze, but they've not been enough to assure critics.

Apart from the mindless decision to reduce tax for the rich, I could see what Truss and Kwarteng were doing. They felt that by announcing this mini-budget, more money will be in people's pockets. There's an element of truth in that. Don't be shocked when I say this, but I'd rather my energy bills be what Truss has brought to the table than Sunak. Do you seriously believe that the media headlines would be sympathetic towards him, if his policies of 'sitting back and do little' were to go ahead?

The problem was this - the Tory leadership shortlist back in the summer provided party members a woeful choice of either voting for a leader that would satisfy people's pockets (albeit in the shorter-term), or one who'd satisfy the markets and banks (who ultimately, aren't trusted by the public). Truss thought she'd take the easier route, and it's backfired.

The calls for her to go in recent days have been relentless. The atmosphere in and around Westminster has never been this toxic and cut-throat. Truss doesn't quite know what to do. She's been so used to following others to further her career (to think 25 years ago, she was an EU-loving, anti-monarchy Liberal Democrat), she now needs to take a leap and stand for what she truly believes in, whatever that really is.

Of course, Labour's loving this. The party is way ahead in every political poll. Leader Keir Starmer firmly believes he's leading the next government and wants it to happen right away, despite us not really knowing how his vision will balance the satisfaction of the public and the markets. Labour is desperate for a general election today, despite it being scheduled to take place in 18-24 months from now.

To be frank, a general election won't make a blindest difference, even if Labour do win. The culture in Westminster is too volatile - any change, for better or worse, will be met with sheer panic, paranoia and pettiness. In this climate, nobody will last ten minutes, Starmer as Prime Minister included. Sadly, nowadays, any misstep in politics means calls for the chop. Get rid of Truss now and that could mean more weeks of Tory in-fighting that we saw during the summer months and thus more upheaval in society. A period of calm is needed, and it starts by actually focusing on improving people's lives, not on whose political careers we want to enhance or trouble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

Now isn't the time to choose a favourite baddie

Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu (Image: Financial Times) I have been rather reflective of late. The global news agenda is dominated by powerful people doing unimaginably awful things, or at least capable of doing so - and they are seemingly given a free pass, having their evil justified, trying to find a reason why their actions aren't that bad compared to the 'other side'. And this is driving me absolutely mad. The less I hear from Benyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and others, the better this world will be. Here we have, at least three cunning maniacs, at it for their personal gain to dominate countries, nationalities and ideologies. Farage has no power, but he is being tipped to be the next UK Prime Minister , for no good reason at all. He gets a few votes from those bored of a Labour government, and critics start getting giddy. Trump thinks of himself as a puppet master, and through his crippling tariffs and mafia-like tactics, is sending his country an...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...