Skip to main content

The future of our young people has never looked so uncertain

Coronavirus: I can't give school reopening date, says Gavin Williamson | Tes
Gavin Williamson (R) with Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Image: TES)

In 2015, I argued that a Conservative government would never find a way to woo young people when they were excluded in key investment announcements and cut life-saving services. Fast forward five years and the Tories continue to find ways to really peeve off our youth. 

What has the government done this time? In my eyes, the ministers are guilty for trying so hard to say to students that they're on their side, to then achieve the total opposite. When the Covid-19 pandemic began, it was clear that the health and education systems were to be severely tested. Thankfully, for the time being, the NHS has gone through the past six months without feeling overwhelmed or in a position of collapse. Of course, the Health Service faces challenges over the coming months, with a possible second spike of Covid-19 cases, an expected backlog of mental health and cancer referrals and the start of flu season, which killed more than 20,000 people in the UK last year.

But it has been our schools that have struggled throughout this current crisis. Back in March, schools were forced to close in an instant despite initial government resistance. Exams were cancelled which almost felt like a government ploy to make young people happy about their summer holidays starting early. Yet, the announcement only created anxiety and confusion, which intensified when A-Level results were calculated by a dodgy algorithm, reportedly downgrading thousands of students. Uproar from parents and students forced Westminster to u-turn and ensured teachers were given the primary voice of their pupils' futures.

Then came the question of whether children would return to school full time after the summer holidays. It is clear now that this is the case, but with localised lockdowns occurring in different parts of the UK, there is never a guarantee that schools will remain open - this depends on the terms of the lockdowns. There is also no guarantee that when a school closes, it'd be done with prior warning.

All this could have been avoided. Had schools been given more time to prepare for a pandemic, teachers could prepare the delivery of virtual lessons better and ensured that pupils had the resources to continue their education at home without missing important lessons. They could have even found a way to facilitate GCSE and A-Level students to take their exams, meaning their final grades would be reflected on performance, not prediction. The rest of Europe were ready in February, the moment the World Health Organization raised alarms, and you don't hear stories about their education systems falling apart.

As a result of this mess, young people are missing out on the chance of fulfilling their true potentials. Yet at the same time, I wouldn't point the blame solely on Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, who has practically been the only minister able to defend the government's decisions in public during this summer period. True, it's his job to improve the education system, even during unprecedented times. However, without clear direction and guidance from 10 Downing Street, Williamson wouldn't have found himself in the sticky situation he finds himself in now.

Education was a secondary focus for the government. The Tories' initial key focus was to ensure the economy didn't tank. Today, the UK is in recession but actually, the figures could have looked a lot worse, had it not been for the freedom Chancellor Rishi Sunak was given. The furlough scheme and 'Eat Out To Help Out' proved extremely popular and potentially steered many organisations away from oblivion for the time being. 

These have made Sunak very popular, but I question how his actions in recent months ultimately benefitted young people. Not only that, but he and the Treasury have other challenges to contend with, including the increasing desire by employees (particularly those with families, i.e. not necessarily young people) - and employers - to adopt a work from home culture. BP plan to close its London headquarters as the firm recognises its offices aren't being used as they use to. Sunak may not think this is a major issue now but empty High Streets and buildings can see even more job losses, and the economy sink that much lower in the long-term.

Whether the working from home trend will last, I can guarantee that if it did, it will cost young people dearly. As someone under 30, I consider some of my colleagues to be my closest friends. You can't properly acquaint with new colleagues via Zoom. Where else, other than school, will young people make friends that aren't family members? You can argue Scouts or Girl Guides, but their futures are uncertain too - and have been for a while.

The so-called 'new normal' is hindering the future of our children. And while we should be focusing on preserving their futures, we are instead in uproar when they breach Covid-19 guidelines. Selfish some may appear to be, but what else are they going to do? There is so much PlayStation they can play, or Instagram to browse. Not every child has access to a laptop or a tablet to be educated at the same pace as those who have. Not all have gardens to embrace the outdoors, or live near acres of open space. Their confidence are at an all-time low and the government can do so much more to secure their prospects. Downing Street can start by not relying on Gavin Williamson or Rishi Sunak to perform miracles. Young people may not vote Tory in their droves, but that shouldn't stop a Conservative government form measured strategies that allow young people to thrive in a post-pandemic world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

Now isn't the time to choose a favourite baddie

Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu (Image: Financial Times) I have been rather reflective of late. The global news agenda is dominated by powerful people doing unimaginably awful things, or at least capable of doing so - and they are seemingly given a free pass, having their evil justified, trying to find a reason why their actions aren't that bad compared to the 'other side'. And this is driving me absolutely mad. The less I hear from Benyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and others, the better this world will be. Here we have, at least three cunning maniacs, at it for their personal gain to dominate countries, nationalities and ideologies. Farage has no power, but he is being tipped to be the next UK Prime Minister , for no good reason at all. He gets a few votes from those bored of a Labour government, and critics start getting giddy. Trump thinks of himself as a puppet master, and through his crippling tariffs and mafia-like tactics, is sending his country an...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...