Skip to main content

New Labour leaders need to say loads more than "I will win elections"


Image result for keir starmer downing street"
Sir Keir Starmer (Image: Business Insider)

The Labour Party leadership contest has begun. Between now and Saturday 4th April, five MPs are vying to become Leader of the Opposition and five more are pitching to be Labour's Deputy Leader. There are lots to be said by all ten over the coming weeks and as a member myself, there is a bigger part of me that is intrigued than nervous about how it all turns out

The current atmosphere in Labour is bruised yet solemn. Since Labour's last election win in 2005, there has been five Prime Ministers, and the last three having come from the Conservatives. And with the general election in December 2019 being such a crushing one for the party in red, there are a host of challenges that their next leaders need to tackle, once they are voted into their roles.

This particular leadership election is one that Labour need to do right. It made a mistake when they voted for two leaders - in Jeremy Corbyn and Tom Watson as his deputy - when it turned out they were at loggerheads for a large part of it, or at least Watson was with Corbyn's closest associates. You would very rarely see them sharing a platform and agreeing on the biggest issues, particularly on Labour's approach to Britain leaving the European Union. See, I voted for Liz Kendall for leader and Caroline Flint as deputy in 2015's election, as in my mind, they had similar visions for Labour and would have worked rather well together.

If Corbyn and Watson both showed willingness to work together, there wouldn't have been as many splits in the Party as we saw over the past five years. And as we saw in the general election just a few short weeks ago, the elected MPs spent a lot of time just before Christmas blaming the heavy defeat on everything that moves, and Jeremy Corbyn. So a close partnership between leader and deputy is vital and will be a big factor to who I vote for.

This is my decision - for leader, I have chosen Sir Keir Starmer and for deputy, my first choice is Dr Rosena Allin-Khan. Even saying these words puts me into my little fantasy land. When I first heard they both intended to run their respective campaigns, I was terribly pleased. And I can see them both collaborating effectively.

Image result for rosena allin-khan downing street"
Rosena Allin-Khan and Sadiq Khan (Image: POLITICO Europe)
Starmer, as Shadow Brexit Secretary under Jeremy Corbyn, proved to be the greatest bridge between those who supported the leader and the MPs and party supporters who felt disengaged, much better than Watson. Even with the campaign so young the press don't know how to handle him. They often find it so easy to say if someone is 'too left wing', like fellow leadership candidate Rebecca Long-Bailey, or 'too Blairite'; yet have found it difficult labelling Starmer. That can only be a good thing and hopefully, should he win this election, this press confusion can continue and he is given an opportunity to provide a sense of sensibleness, level-headedness and clarity in the House of Commons. I can also see him beating off claims from Prime Minister Boris Johnson during Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs). Give Johnson an inch, and he'll give you a mile of guff. Give Starmer a chance, and there will be policies that reflect his stature and thus boosting his capabilities of winning bigger elections than the one he faces now.

Put Starmer next to Allin-Khan, then you've hit jackpot. Allin-Khan is a doctor by trade and in her spare time you will see her working at St George's Hospital in Tooting. Having that medical past, she is more than qualified to share her vision for a National Health Service (NHS) that can survive in testing times. I feel her passion and if she can ease the NHS away from its intense pressures, then I'm convinced she can do the same for other cherished corners of society. And as she continues to leap in prominence, there is not much better reward than becoming Deputy Leader.

Of course, both Starmer and Allin-Khan winning could fuel the myth that Labour is too London-centric and that they therefore know nothing about the issues facing communities outside of the M25. Both MPs hold constituencies in the capital. However, it is somewhat dangerous to say anyone should pick a leader based on where they represent. Those who are running for such prestigious titles are perfectly aware of the need to unite the entire country, otherwise why would they be running in the first place? Besides, Boris Johnson was Mayor of London for eight years and the current MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, in, yes, London.

So why wouldn't I vote for the other candidates? The leadership race actually has a host of impressive names and I wouldn't complain if either Jess Phillips or Emily Thornberry emerged victorious either. I enjoy their authenticity, enthusiasm and passion. My concern with both is around how they manage these three great traits. Sometimes, they can be misconstrued at the time when it matters most, i.e. during election campaigns or during PMQs. Thornberry has experience sitting in for Corbyn during PMQs and has performed well. But it could be a long time between now and the next general election. Would their popularity keep up for that period? If either win, I hope, in their case, the answer is 'yes'. Regardless of the result, I hope they both stick around.
Image result for lisa nandy john mcdonnell"
Lisa Nandy with Jeremy Corbyn (Image: The Telegraph)

This leads me to the final two candidates. If you are into your 'wings' (remember, I relate to chicken wings more than political wings), you probably couldn't get any polar opposite candidates than Lisa Nandy and Rebecca Long-Bailey. Nandy has spent a lot of time battling against Labour front-bench ministers in recent years, especially around the issue of anti-Semitism. Largely, she has been right about Labour's laboured approach to it, but I cannot see her pitch beyond the implying of 'I'm definitely not Corbyn, totally the opposite in fact' - which is the same with Long-Bailey implying 'I'm exactly the same as Corbyn and he was the best ever'. These won't help their chances of winning beyond this election. A big shift away from Corbyn's ideas, this early on, will expose the myth that by voting opposite to Corbyn, it will guarantee a general election victory. Considering Labour's current membership landscape, if they are looking to move away from Corbyn-style politics, it will need to be gradual.

The same rule applies to a candidate who promises more of the same as Corbyn as, while good policies were offered, they will never be enough to convince the constituencies, that switched from Labour to Tory for the first time, to move back to red. The key difference here is that Long-Bailey's campaign team haven't hidden the fact they want her to lead alongside Angela Rayner as deputy. But if Rayner doesn't win and Long-Bailey does, the latter has a challenge to change her tone without upsetting her ardent allies.

I'm not too worried about Rayner being Deputy Leader. If my dream of an Allin-Khan win doesn't materialise, losing to Rayner wouldn't be an entirely bad move. With her incredible life story, in that she was a child carer, left school before meaning to, being a young mother and grandmother, and a respected campaigner across the political spectrum, along with the right leader, she has the capability of uniting the party.

A united Labour is critical and my hope is that the eventual winners prioritises this along with overcoming obstacles such as anti-Semitism. In doing so, they must handle criticism with a proactive, not defensive, approach. These are starting blocks to an election victory. That is how the Tories won in December. They ruthlessly ditched those who didn't match Boris Johnson's vision and now have a crop of politicians who sing the same hymn sheet as his, for now at least. These candidates, who have tonnes of potential, need to do a lot more than say "Vote for me because I can win an election". There is no good making promises today that they may not be able to keep in years to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Splitting Britain to its eventual death

Londoner Mo Farah and Sheffield-born Jessica Ennis-Hill set to see their cities drift away from Westminster bubble (Image: Daily Mail) I don't know about you, but I'm loving this year's Olympics. The daunting talk about Brazil's corrupt politics, high levels of extreme poverty and the doping scandal are secondary topics for discussion while the spectacular sporting action and country's tourism boost are dominating headlines. But for me, I've been particularly impressed by UK's togetherness in pride for Team GB's overwhelming success so far. The country's dominance in rowing and cycling is something worth celebrating and hopefully they can provide a new wave of inspiration for many that London 2012 sadly couldn't. With Team GB continuing to shine in Rio de Janeiro, it's a big shame that back at home, political leaders are going out of their way in breaking up the country. In this rate, come Tokyo 2020 Olympics or whoever hosts the 2

Sepp Blatter mustn't resign, yet

Fifa President has to clean-up his mess before deciding to leave Living in Blatter-land World football governing body, Fifa's President Sepp Blatter has been under the spotlight for the second consecutive week and again for all the wrong reasons. Last week he banned British isle national sides from wearing a poppy branding the flower "political" but this time around, on countless interviews with major broadcasting companies yesterday, he controversially said that "there is no racism in football" and if racism occurred in a match, then players involved must handshake at the end of the game. This has sparked anger across the world of football including hierarchies of the English Professional Football Association (PFA), football players such as Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand and pundits alike. After hearing those comments by Blatter, people such as myself would bang our heads on brick walls. Today, the 75-year-old went to clarify his previous afterno

Settling the transgender debate like grown-ups

Flag that represents the trans community (Image: The Age) The 'transgender debate' has been hard to escape in recent years. It's impacting many areas of our lives, including in schools , work and sport . Sadly, the media narrative of these stories has made it impossible to rationally discuss how to best support people who have decided to make this life-changing decision, or how to assure their 'opponents' that they aren't being cast aside, or their rights have been taken from them. I'll try and analyse this as level-headed as possible and conclude what we (UK as a whole) should be doing, as a way of being a world leader on what is seen as a divisive matter, where it ought not to be. The current narrative is arguably led by two very different sides - one, the so-called 'pro-trans' groups, who combatively argue that people who want to transition should have easy access to basically everything; from legally changing their gender, to requiring advanced