Skip to main content

Changing our attitudes towards heroic, yet abusive, icons


Related image
Michael Jackson (Image: spy.com)

It is often said that we should never meet our heroes. If the last ten years was anything to come by, that common saying has some truth in it. In the UK, we've seen TV and radio stars from the 1960s, 70s and 80s dramatically fall from grace as a result of Operation Yewtree with big household names accused, and some guilty, of sexually abusing children. I'd rather not remind you readers about Jimmy Savile, Max Clifford, Gary Glitter, Rolf Harris and others.

You can argue that there was a direct link between these investigations in Britain to allegations currently ongoing in the United States. With so many women coming forward about what film mogul Harvey Weinstein did to them - of which all allegations he strongly denies - it led to the rising movement we see today otherwise known as 'Me Too (#MeToo)'. This campaign has, so far, been a huge success and it's been great to see a lot of people being encouraged to come forward and talk about their horrendous experiences.

Of course, it is worth emphasising that these are allegations. I have been often sceptical about some of the claims that came to public knowledge, unless the victims went beyond the press and use the evidence they possess to bring their situation to justice. It is, frankly, a legal nightmare for the victims who can ill-afford the costs of bringing their culprits to justice. That said, the tide is turning somewhat with the likes of Bill Cosby behind bars. And no doubt we will see a host more personalities facing their biggest reputational challenges yet - two recent ones I am shedding light here.

In recent months there have been two explosive documentaries, placing the spotlight on two globally recognised music icons that are facing scrutiny like no other as a result of these broadcasts. They are R Kelly and Michael Jackson.
Image result for r kelly space jam
R Kelly (Image: Vulture)

I watched these two documentaries - Surviving R Kelly and Leaving Neverland - with great intrigue and an open mind. Arguably, one of my favourite songs is "I Believe I Can Fly", a song R Kelly recorded for one of my all-time favourite childhood films, Space Jam. With Michael Jackson, there are a catalogue of hits of his which I have saved on my MP3 Player. So upon discovering the two films were coming out, I knew I had to see them and be part of the fierce debates we're still seeing today as a result.

It needs to be noted, at this point, that allegations around R Kelly and Michael Jackson abusing children have been documented for decades. Both have faced trials in the noughties and both acquitted. The big difference today is that R Kelly is still facing court hearings and time behind bars, Michael Jackson passed away nearly ten years ago so will never be able to face further scrutiny physically. So before these documentaries were released, those who have been following both cases, had known the premise. But what little of us expected to see, or hear, was the graphic details.

Quite honestly, the descriptions of the abuse these children and young people faced were disgusting. There are no words. During the seven hours of R Kelly's series and four hours of Michael Jackson's, I was practically speechless. It was absolutely compelling to watch and the alleged victims were very convincing. I still believe their stories are convincingly true too. As much as the super fans of these two singers want to ignore, they have to face the facts - the actions of R Kelly and Michael Jackson were cruel, appalling and they rightly deserve the negative attention we're seeing. You cannot make up these allegations, and for that long. Why would anyone want to go through what these young people experienced, and think only money was the motivation to come out? They were honest accounts and every witness portrayed both sides to these musical icons - the good and the ugly.

The patterns around these allegations cannot be ignored. It's been widely documented that Jimmy Savile used his fame and successful TV shows to access children. Yet it took so quickly for the vocal members of the public to totally shun him and the work he did, and for it, we won't see an episode of any of "Jim'll Fix It" or "Top of the Tops" he guest hosted again. You can see the pattern is similar with R Kelly and Michael Jackson, in terms of how they sought those they abused, using their live performances to stage those who later accuse them of sexual violations. They had the power and influence, and abused it, despite their dark pasts (R Kelly and Michael Jackson were both abused as children).
Related image
Michael Jackson's funeral (Image: Zimbio)

The question is now, what do we do with this information? While R Kelly is being brought to justice, does that mean we cannot listen to his music? Will the countless awards Michael Jackson ever won be annulled and we'll never hear "Billy Jean" or "Thriller" again? What would this mean to their collaborators' reputations who may, or may not, have known about the whereabouts of the culprits? These may appear like first world problems but their impacts are so significant, these debates cannot be set aside. These are difficult questions - considering even after Jackson's widely publicised court case of similar allegations, almost tarnishing his career then, almost as many viewers watched his funeral than Princess Diana's worldwide.

What we are now seeing however is a trend of actions that we didn't see 10-15 years ago regarding these two acts. Radio stations are taking action, with those in Australia and New Zealand publicly saying they'll never play Jackson's music. Even the TV show The Simpsons announced the removal of the episode which Jackson voiced in, from all streaming services - it is arguably one of their most recognised episodes to date.

The revelations from these documentaries are tough to take and I must say, since watching these films, playing "I Just Can't Stop Loving You" by Michael Jackson the other day was like playing Wham's "Last Christmas" in June. It almost felt wrong. But having analysed it later, I still feel compelled to listen to his music. So many of the lyrics he performed offered so much hope and want to make us dance without a genuine care in the world.

How easy will be it be to distinguish the music and the person who performs them? Can moral high ground defeat musical pleasure? Personally, I believe that only time will tell. Current generations who were raised by these songs will find it difficult to stop, as too will I. The true answer comes from the habits of the next generation, who no doubt will set the music trends in the next 10-15 years. Let's see if they will be inclined to make that decision and choose songs from Michael Jackson or Jackson 5 to download. It's up to them, because we won't change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ultimate Bond review

Bonds from left to right: Timothy Dalton, Roger Moore, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby (Image: Daily Express) Earlier this year, I set myself a challenge - an unserious one at that. yet it was something I took seriously. For years, I have been fascinated by the James Bond franchise but only based my interest on Daniel Craig's films, which were the only ones I had seen up to that point. April this year, I couldn't answer the important questions - what was my favourite Bond film? Who played the iconic character best? I could tell you which song I rated the highest because I knew and love each of them - I feel the 'Bond theme' is a genre of its own, they are that good. So over the last six months or so, I did it. I watched all 25 films, in order from Dr No to No Time To Die. Yes, there are two other 'unofficial' films - Never Say Never Again and the 1967 version of Casino Royale. While they included Bond as the protagonist, they aren...

A divided world cannot afford another Trump term

Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin (Image: The Atlantic) This time next month, we get to find out whether it is Kamala Harris or Donald Trump to replace Joe Biden as President. For the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 , the chief in the White House is not seeking to fight on.  Biden didn't want to step back. Right up until his final decision, he stubbornly insisted he was the right person to take on former President Trump for a second time. However, questions were being asked about his wellbeing as the 81-year-old had been seen stumbling his words and steps , panicking key Democrat politicians and donors . Their warnings were stark and quite honestly, if he was to carry on by the party's convention, I doubt he'd have been endorsed by his peers. He, nor they, could afford any division when there is threat of another Trump administration looming. It's hard to define Biden's presidential legacy. I suppose he secured it in November 2020 when he defeated Trump w...

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...