Skip to main content

Theresa's special number and what she should do with it


Image result for theresa may brexit speech
Theresa May's challenges aren't restricted to the devolved nations (Image: PoliticsHome.com)

Leaving the European Union would result in the UK being £394 million better off, every week. This is apparently how much Westminster pays to Brussels for EU membership. If this figure is actually true, it gives the British government a perfect opportunity to layout plans in how they'd spend this huge chunk of money, benefitting the disadvantaged and disengaged members of society.

Unfortunately, Prime Minister Theresa May has already set out her plans to spend, spend, spend and I strongly believe it's a wasted opportunity. She's decided to go the "Boris route" and say all of this dosh is off to the NHS.

Don't get me wrong, I strongly encourage effective funding towards our Health Service. As I've argued in the past however, throwing money at problems NHS face won't solve the pressures they face on a daily basis. In my view, current investment focus should go towards frontline recruitment, as well as innovation, research and hospital building maintenance - and anything to avoid patients being treated in corridors. At the moment, funding across their board is disproportionate, and rejigging is the answer to NHS's conundrum as opposed to adding to their kitty more than we're already doing. An extra £394 million a week won't make the NHS a service that would satisfy everyone.

So where should that money go? Naturally, it needs to go towards the so-called "divorce bill", which approximates to £39 billion. Naturally, it needs to go towards cutting the gross national debt, currently at £1.763 trillion. In addition to that, the money spent must be visible so the public can see how impactful leaving the European Union is - it is the least this government can do.
Related image
EU funds more than car parks (Image: WalesOnline)

Ultimately, the money should go directly to communities across the devolved nations, in addition to the Midlands and north of England. These are the key areas that rely so much of funds from Europe, the moment the UK leaves the Union, many community centres, art centres, parks, employment schemes, youth centres and libraries risk being closed down. These towns will miss out on tonnes of positive investment and too many people will feel the pinch as a consequence.

Believe it or not, the EU invests around £4.5 billion every year in projects and centres across the UK. Imagine all these funds vanishing and the government not planning to ensure these continue as normal? These projects and centres are designed to benefit every generation, putting young people into jobs and away from trouble, and the elderly away from loneliness and thrive regardless of their age. These projects and centres need protection and support, otherwise they'll be left behind and rely on money from the Lottery and local government - the latter of which having extremely limited resources at present.

2019 will pose poignant challenges and changes never seen in the UK since the last century. Whether the country actually leaves the EU or not (anything can happen), a government priority is to limit the revolt we currently see. We know that ditching European Union membership will impact on the economy and alter the way our home and foreign policies function in modern Britain. This should be Theresa May's chance to bring the country together and set out the true benefits of the 'deal' she helped set out with Brussels, which quite honestly, has something both sides of the debate can take positives from, as long as they stop criticising it for the sake of strengthening their personal agenda.

Right now, this government's legacy is centred on this exit. They can still avoid this by connecting with Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the most ignored parts of England - and do so much more than just visit these places and say 'like the deal or else', like she's done this week. Westminster will have a blank canvas with the Welsh government when First Minister Carwyn Jones is no more from 11th December 2018. In Northern Ireland, May cannot allow herself to be downed by the DUP who are incapable of holding a government of their own.
Image result for nicola sturgeon theresa may november 2018
Nicola Sturgeon with May (Image: Sky News)

In Scotland, May faces a tougher challenge because their First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, will be in power until at least 2021, unless she faces a personal or professional crises before then. Over the next two years, as they have done for many moons, Sturgeon's SNP will continue their agenda against Westminster, and will use the Scottish result in 2016's EU referendum against May - the country voted convincingly Remain. It will be up to the ever-so-popular Ruth Davidson to choose whether she'll be an ally of the British government, which could make May's challenge even greater.

May's biggest challenge, however, is satisfying north of England. The majority there voted Leave with, presumably, the pretence that the result wouldn't affect them directly. The moment they realise more centres and libraries close down, and the government not doing enough to replace said EU funding with their own, that will be the difference between May's cabinet and one led by Labour, whether it's Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister or his successor. And this choice will linger across the minds of millions across the country if the government's plans go astray.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

Now isn't the time to choose a favourite baddie

Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu (Image: Financial Times) I have been rather reflective of late. The global news agenda is dominated by powerful people doing unimaginably awful things, or at least capable of doing so - and they are seemingly given a free pass, having their evil justified, trying to find a reason why their actions aren't that bad compared to the 'other side'. And this is driving me absolutely mad. The less I hear from Benyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and others, the better this world will be. Here we have, at least three cunning maniacs, at it for their personal gain to dominate countries, nationalities and ideologies. Farage has no power, but he is being tipped to be the next UK Prime Minister , for no good reason at all. He gets a few votes from those bored of a Labour government, and critics start getting giddy. Trump thinks of himself as a puppet master, and through his crippling tariffs and mafia-like tactics, is sending his country an...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...