Skip to main content

Person of the Year 'Suits' royal-to-be


http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/171127140648-02-harry-meghan-engagement-1127-full-169.jpg
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle (Image: CNN)

Meghan Markle never received the global appreciation she truly deserved. Unless you watched Suits on Netflix, or lived in the United States long enough to fully notice the models on Deal or No Deal, you wouldn't really recognise Ms Markle as a renowned superstar.

Meghan's rise to universal fame has been relatively instant. She wasn't the main character in Suits yet she used her then limited fame to inspire other women around the world through World Vision and other massive charities. She was also an on-demand model and consumer ambassador. But all of this was heightened to astronomical levels after she met her English prince, Harry.

Soon to be fifth in line to the throne, Prince Harry went through one helluva rollercoaster when it came to his relationships before meeting his California girl. His image - not just in the love department - was anything but royal. During the noughties in particular, he was subject to crazy tabloid headlines, being a zero one minute when getting involved in wild, boozy Vegas parties, and hero, by joining the Army, the next.

However, it was Harry's relationship status that was consistently high on the agenda of enthusiasts. Big brother William had it all sorted rather early with his squeaky clean marriage with Kate Middleton, while speculation surrounding who would be Mrs Prince Harry escalated. Who'd have thought it being actress Meghan Markle?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000234452008.jpg?strip=all&w=687
Prince Harry at Invictus (Image: The Sun)

Their relationship became public in 2016. It was meant to be private for a lot longer than it was, but with obscure photos of the pair together, kiss-and-tell stories left, right and centre, and social media going in overdrive, an official, yet subtle, press statement from Kensington Palace put 'Meghan Markle' and 'girlfriend' in the same context.

The couple never look back since. September this year confirmed that this courtship was more than a fling, when both went out together during the Invictus Games, to which he created. It was only a matter of time they'd take it to the next level, and after approval from both families, their engagement was announced.

While many now are counting down the days until their wedding day - Saturday 19th May 2018, by the way - I continue to admire how endearing this relationship is. I mean, we're not in 2018 yet and this wedding is the key contender to being the biggest event of the year. No other high profile wedding will compete, that's for sure. I genuinely wish the best for them - especially for Meghan Markle.

It is no question Meghan is my choice for 'Person of the Year'. TIME Magazine chose the group of women who uncovered the darkest side to Hollywood and beyond. We could have chosen survivors of Grenfell Tower who deserve plaudits, as too Ariana Grande who did so much to pick Manchester up after the terrorist attack after her pop concert in the city. However, I want to point out Meghan's personal sacrifices as a result of her decision to marry Prince Harry, because they're hugely significant.

Regardless of how long her relationship with Prince Harry will last, Meghan's life has changed forever. For one, she's made a drastic career change unlikely to be overturned. By being a Duchess, she's waved goodbye to her acting and modelling. She'd have gotten away with his had Harry not been as high profile as he is today. Mike Tindall could, as his wife - and Harry's cousin - Zara Phillips is considerably lower in the royal food chain meaning they could continue their jobs without maximum press interference.
https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/suits-4.jpg?w=446&h=299&crop=1
Meghan Markle in 'Suits' (Image: Deadline.com)

For Meghan, it's different. While it's unlikely we'll see King Henry IX (as Harry would be known), the couple will spend more time performing official royal duties than she would travelling home to Los Angeles having a chinwag with fellow cast members. Though, she knows what she's signed up to, otherwise, she wouldn't make such a commitment, right?

Not only her career would change, so would her religion and citizenship. She's hasn't been baptised and isn't a British citizen. And seeing is grandmother - The Queen - leads the Church of England, Meghan must be baptised and 'confirmed' before her nuptials. It is worth mentioning she's a divorcee too. Prince Harry is certainly ripping up royal tradition, isn't he? Good!

I admire Meghan Markle for making this move. She worked incredibly hard to get to where she was in the entertainment business, but now faces her biggest challenge yet. The acting industry is nothing compared to the royal shenanigans that lay ahead. By becoming a Duchess that high up in the royal food chain, she'll soon realise there's more to the role than red carpet appearances.

Meghan comes into the royal scene completely inexperienced. She's not been with Harry two years yet, and hasn't basked in palaces for as long as, say, Kate Middleton or Princess Diana did prior to their respected marriages. Meghan does however, have arguably more life experience - she's 36, a year older than Kate, who was 29 when she married Prince William.

I'm intrigued to find how the next five months and beyond transpires for Meghan. She's a proven tough cookie and held powerful views before adopting her new royal ways. Now she has a duty to contain them and learn a fresh way of living. I'm sure she'll be absolutely fine, so long as she avoids scandal and takes what the British press say with a pinch of salt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'cancel culture' myth

Let's cancel the term 'cancel culture' once and for all (Image: Fox News) In recent months, we have seen the UK's Supreme Court declare ' what a woman is ', the rise of the 'far right' in the United States and larger parts of Europe and the centre-left being accused of echoing words which were deemed unacceptable the day before. These stories as isolated items don't seem a big deal but, through their individual merits, have become significant societal shifts. That's largely thanks to the campaign groups who led them. For a long time, they have been playing cry wolf, sharing viral sop stories about how their 'plight' has resulted them being on the verge of 'losing everything', including relevance. With victories heading their way, and their crocodile tears turning into money eyes, it is fair to say that 'cancel culture' is officially over. Let's be honest, 'cancel culture' never existed. The myth has brainwashe...

Now isn't the time to choose a favourite baddie

Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu (Image: Financial Times) I have been rather reflective of late. The global news agenda is dominated by powerful people doing unimaginably awful things, or at least capable of doing so - and they are seemingly given a free pass, having their evil justified, trying to find a reason why their actions aren't that bad compared to the 'other side'. And this is driving me absolutely mad. The less I hear from Benyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and others, the better this world will be. Here we have, at least three cunning maniacs, at it for their personal gain to dominate countries, nationalities and ideologies. Farage has no power, but he is being tipped to be the next UK Prime Minister , for no good reason at all. He gets a few votes from those bored of a Labour government, and critics start getting giddy. Trump thinks of himself as a puppet master, and through his crippling tariffs and mafia-like tactics, is sending his country an...

JSPrice Person of the Year 2024: Elon Musk

Elon Musk and Donald Trump (Image: AP News) When TIME Magazine picks its 'Person of the Year', it's never because the title's editors 'like' a certain individual or group of people. The 'accolade', if you ever want to call it that, is often chosen based on an influencer who has delivered the greatest impact or had a 'big' year, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the said person/people's agenda. So when the title picked Donald Trump this time around, it's not because the editors enjoyed how he defeated Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States. It was because he had one crazy 2024. There were times when we were led to believe he could be behind bars, having appeared in court for at least four different, serious cases. The Politico website has an excellent ' tracker ', so we know exactly what he's been accused of. Despite this, on Monday 20th January 2025, Trump will be sworn in for his second te...